IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the costs of air pollution to the National Health Service and social care: An assessment and forecast up to 2035

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Pimpin
  • Lise Retat
  • Daniela Fecht
  • Laure de Preux
  • Franco Sassi
  • John Gulliver
  • Annalisa Belloni
  • Brian Ferguson
  • Emily Corbould
  • Abbygail Jaccard
  • Laura Webber

Abstract

Background: Air pollution damages health by promoting the onset of some non-communicable diseases (NCDs), putting additional strain on the National Health Service (NHS) and social care. This study quantifies the total health and related NHS and social care cost burden due to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in England. Method and findings: Air pollutant concentration surfaces from land use regression models and cost data from hospital admissions data and a literature review were fed into a microsimulation model, that was run from 2015 to 2035. Different scenarios were modelled: (1) baseline ‘no change’ scenario; (2) individuals’ pollutant exposure is reduced to natural (non-anthropogenic) levels to compute the disease cases attributable to PM2.5 and NO2; (3) PM2.5 and NO2 concentrations reduced by 1 μg/m3; and (4) NO2 annual European Union limit values reached (40 μg/m3). For the 18 years after baseline, the total cumulative cost to the NHS and social care is estimated at £5.37 billion for PM2.5 and NO2 combined, rising to £18.57 billion when costs for diseases for which there is less robust evidence are included. These costs are due to the cumulative incidence of air-pollution-related NCDs, such as 348,878 coronary heart disease cases estimated to be attributable to PM2.5 and 573,363 diabetes cases estimated to be attributable to NO2 by 2035. Findings from modelling studies are limited by the conceptual model, assumptions, and the availability and quality of input data. Conclusions: Approximately 2.5 million cases of NCDs attributable to air pollution are predicted by 2035 if PM2.5 and NO2 stay at current levels, making air pollution an important public health priority. In future work, the modelling framework should be updated to include multi-pollutant exposure–response functions, as well as to disaggregate results by socioeconomic status. Using microsimulation, Laura Webber and colleagues project the health and social care cost burden of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in England.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Pimpin & Lise Retat & Daniela Fecht & Laure de Preux & Franco Sassi & John Gulliver & Annalisa Belloni & Brian Ferguson & Emily Corbould & Abbygail Jaccard & Laura Webber, 2018. "Estimating the costs of air pollution to the National Health Service and social care: An assessment and forecast up to 2035," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002602
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002602
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002602&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve Harris & Jan Weinzettel & Gregor Levin, 2020. "Implications of Low Carbon City Sustainability Strategies for 2050," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Owain Simpson & Mark Elliott & Catherine Muller & Tim Jones & Phillippa Hentsch & Daniel Rooney & Nicole Cowell & William J. Bloss & Suzanne E. Bartington, 2022. "Evaluating Actions to Improve Air Quality at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-42, September.
    3. Andrew Fu Wah Ho & Zhongxun Hu & Ting Zhen Cheryl Woo & Kenneth Boon Kiat Tan & Jia Hao Lim & Maye Woo & Nan Liu & Geoffrey G. Morgan & Marcus Eng Hock Ong & Joel Aik, 2022. "Ambient Air Quality and Emergency Hospital Admissions in Singapore: A Time-Series Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Charlotte E. Sheridan & Charlotte J. Roscoe & John Gulliver & Laure de Preux & Daniela Fecht, 2019. "Inequalities in Exposure to Nitrogen Dioxide in Parks and Playgrounds in Greater London," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Agnieszka Jakubowska & Marcin Rabe, 2022. "Air Pollution and Limitations in Health: Identification of Inequalities in the Burdens of the Economies of the “Old” and “New” EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Julia Mink, 2021. "The effects of major life events and exposure to adverse environmental conditions on health and health-related outcomes [Les effets d'événements majeurs de la vie et de l'exposition à des condition," SciencePo Working papers tel-03575191, HAL.
    7. Błażej Łyszczarz & Karolina Sowa, 2022. "Production losses due to mortality associated with modifiable health risk factors in Poland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(1), pages 33-45, February.
    8. Julia Mink, 2021. "The effects of major life events and exposure to adverse environmental conditions on health and health-related outcomes [Les effets d'événements majeurs de la vie et de l'exposition à des condition," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03575191, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.