IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pmed00/1002571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical, socioeconomic, and behavioural factors at age 50 years and risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and mortality: A cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Archana Singh-Manoux
  • Aurore Fayosse
  • Séverine Sabia
  • Adam Tabak
  • Martin Shipley
  • Aline Dugravot
  • Mika Kivimäki

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity is increasingly common and is associated with adverse health outcomes, highlighting the need to broaden the single-disease framework that dominates medical research. We examined the role of midlife clinical characteristics, socioeconomic position, and behavioural factors in the development of cardiometabolic multimorbidity (at least 2 of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and stroke), along with how these factors modify risk of mortality. Methods and findings: Data on 8,270 men and women were drawn from the Whitehall II cohort study, with mean follow-up of 23.7 years (1985 to 2017). Three sets of risk factors were assessed at age 50 years, each on a 5-point scale: clinical profile (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, overweight/obesity, family history of cardiometabolic disease), occupational position, and behavioural factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, physical activity). The outcomes examined were cardiometabolic disease (diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke), cardiometabolic multimorbidity, and mortality. We used multi-state models to examine the role of risk factors in 5 components of the cardiometabolic disease trajectory: from healthy state to first cardiometabolic disease, from first cardiometabolic disease to cardiometabolic multimorbidity, from healthy state to death, from first cardiometabolic disease to death, and from cardiometabolic multimorbidity to death. A total of 2,501 participants developed 1 of the 3 cardiometabolic diseases, 511 developed cardiometabolic multimorbidity, and 1,406 died. When behavioural and clinical risk factors were considered individually, only smoking was associated with all five transitions. In a model containing all 3 risk factor scales, midlife clinical profile was the strongest predictor of first cardiometabolic disease (hazard ratio for the least versus most favourable profile: 3.74; 95% CI: 3.14–4.45) among disease-free participants. Among participants with 1 cardiometabolic disease, adverse midlife socioeconomic (1.54; 95% CI: 1.10–2.15) and behavioural factors (2.00; 95% CI: 1.40–2.85), but not clinical characteristics, were associated with progression to cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Only midlife behavioural factors predicted mortality among participants with cardiometabolic disease (2.12; 95% CI: 1.41–3.18) or cardiometabolic multimorbidity (3.47; 95% CI: 1.81–6.66). A limitation is that the study was not large enough to estimate transitions between each disease and subsequent outcomes and between all possible pairs of diseases. Conclusions: The importance of specific midlife factors in disease progression, from disease-free state to single disease, multimorbidity, and death, varies depending on the disease stage. While clinical risk factors at age 50 determine the risk of incident cardiometabolic disease in a disease-free population, midlife socioeconomic and behavioural factors are stronger predictors of progression to multimorbidity and mortality in people with cardiometabolic disease. Archana Singh-Manoux and colleagues report on the contribution that midlife socioeconomic and behavioural factors make to multimorbidity and mortality in those with cardiometabolic disease.Why was this study done?: What did the researchers do and find?: What do these findings mean?:

Suggested Citation

  • Archana Singh-Manoux & Aurore Fayosse & Séverine Sabia & Adam Tabak & Martin Shipley & Aline Dugravot & Mika Kivimäki, 2018. "Clinical, socioeconomic, and behavioural factors at age 50 years and risk of cardiometabolic multimorbidity and mortality: A cohort study," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002571
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002571
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002571&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Younghwa Baek & Kihyun Park & Kyoungsik Jung & Siwoo Lee, 2022. "Individual Differences in the Association of Lifestyle with Cardiometabolic Risk in Middle-Aged Koreans Based on Traditional Korean Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Shihan Zhen & Qian Li & Jian Liao & Bin Zhu & Fengchao Liang, 2023. "Associations between Household Solid Fuel Use, Obesity, and Cardiometabolic Health in China: A Cohort Study from 2011 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Rolla Mira & Tim Newton & Wael Sabbah, 2022. "Inequalities in the progress of multiple chronic conditions: A systematic review of longitudinal studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Xunjie Cheng & Tianqi Ma & Feiyun Ouyang & Guogang Zhang & Yongping Bai, 2022. "Trends in the Prevalence of Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity in the United States, 1999–2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Hlaing Hlaing-Hlaing & Xenia Dolja-Gore & Meredith Tavener & Erica L. James & Allison M. Hodge & Alexis J. Hure, 2021. "Diet Quality and Incident Non-Communicable Disease in the 1946–1951 Cohort of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-21, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pmed00:1002571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosmedicine (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.