IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the strength of maternal, newborn and child health care implementation and its association with childhood mortality risk in three rural districts of Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Baynes
  • Almamy Malick Kanté
  • Amon Exavery
  • Tani Kassimu
  • Gloria Sikustahili
  • Hildegalda Mushi
  • Kate Ramsey
  • Kenneth Sherr
  • Bryan Weiner
  • James F Phillips

Abstract

This observational cohort study explores the association between maternal, newborn and child health care (MNCH) implementation strength and child survival in rural Tanzania from 2011-2015. Measuring this relationship is crucial to improve health outcomes and inform decision-making by identifying which interventions are most effective, where gaps exist, and how to strengthen primary health care systems. We used data from a 2011 service availability and readiness assessment that quantified health facilities’ ability to implement MNCH services and a household survey that measured MNCH service utilization to develop domain-specific summary measures of the effective coverage of MNCH. We reduced domain-specific effective coverage scores into fewer, independent scales of implementation strength of services that were delivered by facilities using principal components analysis and mixed effects models. We linked these scales to longitudinal data on the survival of children that were born in the catchment areas of the surveyed health facilities during the assessment period and followed up until December 31, 2015. We fit survival time models to estimate the relationship between implementation strength and child mortality. Increases in the implementation strength gauged by our first and second scales, which represented general facility readiness and the provision of preventive MNCH and sick childcare services, respectively, were associated with child mortality risks that were significantly lower (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37, 0.92; HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27, 0.94). We detected no significant child mortality response to our third scale, which represented intrapartum care provision. The findings have implications for MNCH policy and health systems measurement. First, the analysis suggests that strong implementation of antenatal, postnatal, early childhood preventive services and sick childcare can accelerate child mortality reduction. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates a methodological approach for using routine data on service availability and readiness to measure health systems strengthening and its impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Baynes & Almamy Malick Kanté & Amon Exavery & Tani Kassimu & Gloria Sikustahili & Hildegalda Mushi & Kate Ramsey & Kenneth Sherr & Bryan Weiner & James F Phillips, 2025. "Measuring the strength of maternal, newborn and child health care implementation and its association with childhood mortality risk in three rural districts of Tanzania," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005346
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005346
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005346&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonsson, Urban, 1986. "Ideological framework and health development in Tanzania 1961-2000," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 745-753, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.