IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0004413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The determinants of female genital mutilation among daughters in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Echezona Nzelu
  • Uche Maureen Nzelu
  • Amara Rita Ugwunze
  • Ngozi Azodoh

Abstract

Female Genital Mutilation/Circumcision (FGM/C) refers to the complete or incomplete removal of the female external genital or other injuries for non-medical or cultural reasons. It is a culturally harmful practice without health benefits with long-term complications to women’s psychological, physical, and sexual health and well-being that violates the victims’ rights because it is done without their consent. Despite International efforts to eradicate this harmful practice, it persists, therefore, this study examined the sociodemographic factors of mothers of reproductive age that affected the likelihood of their daughters undergoing female genital mutilation or circumcision. The 2021 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) female genital mutilation response weighted data of women of reproductive age 15-49 years was used for this study. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were done to predict the determinants of female genital mutilation among daughters, and those with a p-value of ≤.05 were considered statistically significant determinants. Results showed a statistically significant difference between educational level, ethnicity of household head, household wealth index, geopolitical zone, ever circumcised, and daughter circumcised at Alpha =.05 in the multivariable regression analysis. Place of Residence and Marital Status were not statistically significant in the multivariable regression analysis at Alpha =.05. Considering that Nigeria has a population of over 200 million people, a figure of 14.2% of daughters circumcised is high and, therefore, requires concerted interventions by all stakeholders to address this harmful practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Echezona Nzelu & Uche Maureen Nzelu & Amara Rita Ugwunze & Ngozi Azodoh, 2025. "The determinants of female genital mutilation among daughters in Nigeria," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004413
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004413
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0004413&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanni Yaya & Bishwajit Ghose, 2018. "Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria: A Persisting Challenge for Women’s Rights," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benedict Ekow Ocran & Godwin Agot Atiigah, 2022. "An Insider–Outsider Approach to Understanding the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in Pusiga in the Upper East Region of Ghana," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.