Author
Listed:
- Michelle Amri
- Anna Socha
- Elisabeth Huang
- Daniel Steel
- Danielle Jacobson
- Jesse B Bump
Abstract
This study investigates the operationalization of health equity and associated challenges faced by directors of policy and planning and those in related positions in the African Region. The results of this study demonstrate that health equity is generally a priority for policymakers in practice and is operationalized in four ways: (i) targeting priority groups, (ii) focusing on the entire population; (iii) through procedural justice; and (iv) operationalizing population health data. The targeted approach, which predominated, tended to focus on individuals with lower socioeconomic status, maternal and child health services, and select infectious diseases (e.g., HIV/AIDS). The population-wide approach entailed the inclusion of health equity in institutional laws, constitutions, and national policies with efforts to ensure access to health services for all. Procedural justice largely focused on the inclusion of stakeholders in decision-making processes. Lastly, operationalizing population health data was noted to guide policy and planning to address health inequities, often through aiding in the selection of priority groups or areas for intervention and monitoring and evaluation actions focused on improving health equity. Four main domains of challenges for incorporating health equity emerged relating to: (i) understanding health equity, (ii) governance, (iii) resources, and (iv) lack of data. Our recommendations are two-fold: (i) we recommend that researchers focus on improving understandings of health equity among policymakers through knowledge translation and exchange, and (ii) we recommend that policymakers and those working within donor organizations focus on reforming any top-down processes through which priorities are set and decisions are made.Author summary: Health equity remains a key goal for policymakers globally. Our study explores how health equity is understood and put into practice by directors of policy and planning and those in related positions in the African Region. After distributing a survey, we found that health equity is prioritized in four ways: (i) by targeting specific groups, (ii) by focusing on the entire population, (iii) through direct inclusion of the population in decision-making processes, and (iv) by using health data for policy and planning decisions. Notably, the most common approach focused on targeted policies and interventions for individuals with lower socioeconomic status, maternal and child health services, and select infectious diseases. Despite these actions on health equity, policymakers shared that challenges remain relating to: (i) understanding health equity, (ii) governance, (iii) resource constraints, and (iv) lack of data. We recommend that: (i) researchers focus on improving understandings of health equity among policymakers through sharing knowledge, and (ii) policymakers and those working within donor organizations focus on reforming any processes where decisions and priorities are imposed, non-participatory, or not inclusive (i.e., top-down processes).
Suggested Citation
Michelle Amri & Anna Socha & Elisabeth Huang & Daniel Steel & Danielle Jacobson & Jesse B Bump, 2025.
"How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16, March.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004384
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004384
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0004384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.