IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0003015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do people sell their kidneys? A thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Bijaya Shrestha
  • Luechai Sringernyuang
  • Manash Shrestha
  • Binita Shrestha
  • Anuska Adhikari
  • Dev Ram Sunuwar
  • Shiva Raj Mishra
  • Bipin Adhikari

Abstract

Globally, demands for the kidneys have surpassed supply both living and deceased donors. High demands relative to the availability have made the kidney one of the most saleable human organs. The main objective was to explore the drivers of kidney selling. Literature related to kidney selling and its drivers was explored in three databases including MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus (Elsevier), and JSTOR covering the period from 1987 to 2022. A total of 15 articles were selected, which underwent thematic analysis. Investigators independently assessed the articles for relevance and study quality to synthesize the data. The thematic analysis involved a critical approach to understanding the reasons for kidney selling by examining power disparities and social inequities. Kidney selling and the underlying reasons for it showed similarities across various geographic regions. Several factors were identified which increased individuals’ vulnerability for kidney selling. At the micro level, poverty and illiteracy emerged as significant factors. Lack of financial safety nets obliged family to resort to kidney selling which helped to alleviate poverty, resolve debt, and other urgent financial issues. Nonetheless, the revenues from kidney selling were also used to purchase luxury items (diverting away from investing in livelihood expenses) such as buying motorbikes, mobile phones and televisions. Family, and gender responsibilities also played roles in kidney selling such as obligations related to paying dowry made parents particularly vulnerable. Surprisingly, a few victims of kidney selling later adopted kidney brokering role to support their livelihood. Kidney selling was further fostered by lack of stringent policy to regulate and monitor background checks for kidney transplantation. There were myriad factors that affected individual’s vulnerability to kidney selling which stemmed from micro (poverty, illiteracy), meso (weak legal system, lacking stringent institutional policy, regulatory framework) and macro (social inequalities, corruption, organ shortage, insufficient health infrastructure) levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Bijaya Shrestha & Luechai Sringernyuang & Manash Shrestha & Binita Shrestha & Anuska Adhikari & Dev Ram Sunuwar & Shiva Raj Mishra & Bipin Adhikari, 2024. "Why do people sell their kidneys? A thematic synthesis of qualitative evidence," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003015
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003015&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mendoza, Roger Lee, 2010. "Kidney black markets and legal transplants: Are they opposite sides of the same coin?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 255-265, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beckert, Jens & Wehinger, Frank, 2011. "In the shadow illegal markets and economic sociology," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0003015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.