IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of community-based burden estimation to achieve elimination of lymphatic filariasis: A comparative cross-sectional investigation in Côte d’Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Hope Simpson
  • Daniele O Konan
  • Kouma Brahima
  • Jeanne d’Arc Koffi
  • Saidi Kashindi
  • Melissa Edmiston
  • Stefanie Weiland
  • Katherine Halliday
  • Rachel L Pullan
  • Aboulaye Meite
  • Benjamin Guibehi Koudou
  • Joseph Timothy

Abstract

For lymphatic filariasis (LF) elimination, endemic countries must document the burden of LF morbidity (LFM). Community-based screening (CBS) is used to collect morbidity data, but evidence demonstrating its reliability is limited. Recent pilots of CBS for LFM alongside mass drug administration (MDA) in Côte d’Ivoire suggested low LFM prevalence (2.1–2.2 per 10,000). We estimated LFM prevalence in Bongouanou District, Côte d’Ivoire, using a comparative cross-sectional design. We compared CBS implemented independently of MDA, adapted from existing Ministry of Health protocols, to a population-based prevalence survey led by formally trained nurses. We evaluated the reliability of case identification, coverage, equity, and cost of CBS. CBS identified 87.4 cases of LFM per 10,000; the survey identified 47.5 (39.4–56.3; prevalence ratio [PR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.64–2.07). CBS identified 39.7 cases of suspect lymphoedema per 10,000; the survey confirmed 35.1 (29.2–41.5) filarial lymphoedema cases per 10,000 (PR 1.13 [0.98–1.31]). CBS identified 96.5 scrotal swellings per 10,000; the survey found 91.3 (83.2–99.8; PR 1.06 [0.93–1.21]); including 33.9 (27.7–38.8) filarial hydrocoele per 10,000 (PR of suspect to confirmed hydrocele 2.93 [2.46–3.55]). Positive predictive values for case identification through CBS were 65.0% (55.8–73.5%) for filarial lymphoedema; 93.7% (89.3–96.7%) for scrotal swellings; and 34.0% (27.3–41.2%) for filarial hydrocoele. Households of lower socioeconomic status and certain minority languages were at risk of exclusion. Direct financial costs were $0.17 per individual targeted and $69.62 per case confirmed. Our community-based approach to LFM burden estimation appears scalable and provided reliable prevalence estimates for LFM, scrotal swellings and LF-lymphoedema. The results represent a step-change improvement on CBS integrated with MDA, whilst remaining at programmatically feasible costs. Filarial hydrocoele cases were overestimated, attributable to the use of case definitions suitable for mass-screening by informal staff. Our findings are broadly applicable to countries aiming for LF elimination using CBS. The abstract is available in French in the S1 File.

Suggested Citation

  • Hope Simpson & Daniele O Konan & Kouma Brahima & Jeanne d’Arc Koffi & Saidi Kashindi & Melissa Edmiston & Stefanie Weiland & Katherine Halliday & Rachel L Pullan & Aboulaye Meite & Benjamin Guibehi Ko, 2022. "Effectiveness of community-based burden estimation to achieve elimination of lymphatic filariasis: A comparative cross-sectional investigation in Côte d’Ivoire," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000760
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000760
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000760&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000760?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian K Chu & Pamela J Hooper & Mark H Bradley & Deborah A McFarland & Eric A Ottesen, 2010. "The Economic Benefits Resulting from the First 8 Years of the Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis (2000–2007)," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Miriam Glennie & Karen Gardner & Michelle Dowden & Bart J Currie, 2021. "Active case detection methods for crusted scabies and leprosy: A systematic review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisa Sicuri & David B Evans & Fabrizio Tediosi, 2015. "Can Economic Analysis Contribute to Disease Elimination and Eradication? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Kimberly M. Thompson, 2017. "Modeling and Managing the Risks of Measles and Rubella: A Global Perspective Part II," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1041-1051, June.
    3. repec:plo:pntd00:0001797 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Edeltraud J Lenk & William K Redekop & Marianne Luyendijk & Adriana J Rijnsburger & Johan L Severens, 2016. "Productivity Loss Related to Neglected Tropical Diseases Eligible for Preventive Chemotherapy: A Systematic Literature Review," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. repec:plo:pntd00:0002584 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.