IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1011356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing portability of trans-ancestral polygenic risk scores through tissue-specific functional genomic data integration

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley Crone
  • Alan P Boyle

Abstract

Portability of trans-ancestral polygenic risk scores is often confounded by differences in linkage disequilibrium and genetic architecture between ancestries. Recent literature has shown that prioritizing GWAS SNPs with functional genomic evidence over strong association signals can improve model portability. We leveraged three RegulomeDB-derived functional regulatory annotations—SURF, TURF, and TLand—to construct polygenic risk models across a set of quantitative and binary traits highlighting functional mutations tagged by trait-associated tissue annotations. Tissue-specific prioritization by TURF and TLand provide a significant improvement in model accuracy over standard polygenic risk score (PRS) models across all traits. We developed the Trans-ancestral Iterative Tissue Refinement (TITR) algorithm to construct PRS models that prioritize functional mutations across multiple trait-implicated tissues. TITR-constructed PRS models show increased predictive accuracy over single tissue prioritization. This indicates our TITR approach captures a more comprehensive view of regulatory systems across implicated tissues that contribute to variance in trait expression.Author summary: Polygenic risk score models leverage effect size estimates from ancestry-targeted GWAS to generate well-powered disease stratification models. When ancestry-targeted GWAS is unavailable for understudied populations, trans-ancestral PRS models may be implemented. However, transferring PRS models across ancestries results in limited predictive accuracy due to linkage differences between ancestries. Here we show that isolating GWAS variants with strong functional evidence identified from RegulomeDB-derived annotations in tissues enriched for trait heritability can improve portability of PRS models across distant ancestries. The motivation is mutations with evidence of regulatory impact are more likely to be shared between ancestries than genome-wide significant signals from ancestry-targeted GWAS. Further, we developed the novel TITR algorithm to aggregate functional GWAS mutations across multiple trait-implicated tissues to iteratively construct PRSs. These models provide a more comprehensive view of functional GWAS mutations that influence variation in complex disease expression and can help improve portability of PRS models in under-represented populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley Crone & Alan P Boyle, 2024. "Enhancing portability of trans-ancestral polygenic risk scores through tissue-specific functional genomic data integration," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011356
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011356
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1011356&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011356?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carla Márquez-Luna & Steven Gazal & Po-Ru Loh & Samuel S. Kim & Nicholas Furlotte & Adam Auton & Alkes L. Price, 2021. "Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Yiming Hu & Qiongshi Lu & Ryan Powles & Xinwei Yao & Can Yang & Fang Fang & Xinran Xu & Hongyu Zhao, 2017. "Leveraging functional annotations in genetic risk prediction for human complex diseases," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carla Márquez-Luna & Steven Gazal & Po-Ru Loh & Samuel S. Kim & Nicholas Furlotte & Adam Auton & Alkes L. Price, 2021. "Incorporating functional priors improves polygenic prediction accuracy in UK Biobank and 23andMe data sets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Pereira, Rita & Biroli, Pietro & von hinke, stephanie & Van Kippersluis, Hans & Galama, Titus & Rietveld, Niels & Thom, Kevin, 2022. "Gene-Environment Interplay in the Social Sciences," OSF Preprints d96z3, Center for Open Science.
    3. Md. Moksedul Momin & Jisu Shin & Soohyun Lee & Buu Truong & Beben Benyamin & S. Hong Lee, 2023. "A method for an unbiased estimate of cross-ancestry genetic correlation using individual-level data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Jiacheng Miao & Hanmin Guo & Gefei Song & Zijie Zhao & Lin Hou & Qiongshi Lu, 2023. "Quantifying portable genetic effects and improving cross-ancestry genetic prediction with GWAS summary statistics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Congcong Chen & Yang Li & Yayun Gu & Qiqi Zhai & Songwei Guo & Jun Xiang & Yuan Xie & Mingxing An & Chenmeijie Li & Na Qin & Yanan Shi & Liu Yang & Jun Zhou & Xianfeng Xu & Ziye Xu & Kai Wang & Meng Z, 2025. "Massively parallel variant-to-function mapping determines functional regulatory variants of non-small cell lung cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. repec:osf:osfxxx:d96z3_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Shuang Song & Wei Jiang & Lin Hou & Hongyu Zhao, 2020. "Leveraging effect size distributions to improve polygenic risk scores derived from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1011356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.