IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1005703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Spatial Framework for Understanding Population Structure and Admixture

Author

Listed:
  • Gideon S Bradburd
  • Peter L Ralph
  • Graham M Coop

Abstract

Geographic patterns of genetic variation within modern populations, produced by complex histories of migration, can be difficult to infer and visually summarize. A general consequence of geographically limited dispersal is that samples from nearby locations tend to be more closely related than samples from distant locations, and so genetic covariance often recapitulates geographic proximity. We use genome-wide polymorphism data to build “geogenetic maps,” which, when applied to stationary populations, produces a map of the geographic positions of the populations, but with distances distorted to reflect historical rates of gene flow. In the underlying model, allele frequency covariance is a decreasing function of geogenetic distance, and nonlocal gene flow such as admixture can be identified as anomalously strong covariance over long distances. This admixture is explicitly co-estimated and depicted as arrows, from the source of admixture to the recipient, on the geogenetic map. We demonstrate the utility of this method on a circum-Tibetan sampling of the greenish warbler (Phylloscopus trochiloides), in which we find evidence for gene flow between the adjacent, terminal populations of the ring species. We also analyze a global sampling of human populations, for which we largely recover the geography of the sampling, with support for significant histories of admixture in many samples. This new tool for understanding and visualizing patterns of population structure is implemented in a Bayesian framework in the program SpaceMix.Author Summary: In this paper, we introduce a statistical method for inferring, for a set of sequenced samples, a map in which the distances between population locations reflect genetic, rather than geographic, proximity. Two populations that are sampled at distant locations but that are genetically similar (perhaps one was recently founded by a colonization event from the other) may have inferred locations that are nearby, while two populations that are sampled close together, but that are genetically dissimilar (e.g., are separated by a barrier), may have inferred locations that are farther apart. The result is a “geogenetic” map in which the distances between populations are effective distances, indicative of the way that populations perceive the distances between themselves: the “organism’s-eye view” of the world. Added to this, “admixture” can be thought of as the outcome of unusually long-distance gene flow; it results in relatedness between populations that is anomalously high given the distance that separates them. We depict the effect of admixture using arrows, from a source of admixture to its target, on the inferred map. The inferred geogenetic map is an intuitive and information-rich visual summary of patterns of population structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Gideon S Bradburd & Peter L Ralph & Graham M Coop, 2016. "A Spatial Framework for Understanding Population Structure and Admixture," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1005703
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005703
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005703&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heng Li & Richard Durbin, 2011. "Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences," Nature, Nature, vol. 475(7357), pages 493-496, July.
    2. Daniel John Lawson & Garrett Hellenthal & Simon Myers & Daniel Falush, 2012. "Inference of Population Structure using Dense Haplotype Data," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guindon, Stéphane & Guo, Hongbin & Welch, David, 2016. "Demographic inference under the coalescent in a spatial continuum," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 43-50.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steinrücken, Matthias & Paul, Joshua S. & Song, Yun S., 2013. "A sequentially Markov conditional sampling distribution for structured populations with migration and recombination," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 51-61.
    2. Jerome Kelleher & Alison M Etheridge & Gilean McVean, 2016. "Efficient Coalescent Simulation and Genealogical Analysis for Large Sample Sizes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Gyaneshwer Chaubey & Anurag Kadian & Saroj Bala & Vadlamudi Raghavendra Rao, 2015. "Genetic Affinity of the Bhil, Kol and Gond Mentioned in Epic Ramayana," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Juraj Bergman & Rasmus Ø. Pedersen & Erick J. Lundgren & Rhys T. Lemoine & Sophie Monsarrat & Elena A. Pearce & Mikkel H. Schierup & Jens-Christian Svenning, 2023. "Worldwide Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene population declines in extant megafauna are associated with Homo sapiens expansion rather than climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Ya-Mei Ding & Xiao-Xu Pang & Yu Cao & Wei-Ping Zhang & Susanne S. Renner & Da-Yong Zhang & Wei-Ning Bai, 2023. "Genome structure-based Juglandaceae phylogenies contradict alignment-based phylogenies and substitution rates vary with DNA repair genes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Romain Fournier & Zoi Tsangalidou & David Reich & Pier Francesco Palamara, 2023. "Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Matthieu Bouaziz & Caroline Paccard & Mickael Guedj & Christophe Ambroise, 2012. "SHIPS: Spectral Hierarchical Clustering for the Inference of Population Structure in Genetic Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Elisa Bellucci & Andrea Benazzo & Chunming Xu & Elena Bitocchi & Monica Rodriguez & Saleh Alseekh & Valerio Di Vittori & Tania Gioia & Kerstin Neumann & Gaia Cortinovis & Giulia Frascarelli & Ester Mu, 2023. "Selection and adaptive introgression guided the complex evolutionary history of the European common bean," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Barton, N.H. & Etheridge, A.M. & Kelleher, J. & Véber, A., 2013. "Inference in two dimensions: Allele frequencies versus lengths of shared sequence blocks," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 105-119.
    10. James A Watson & Aimee R Taylor & Elizabeth A Ashley & Arjen Dondorp & Caroline O Buckee & Nicholas J White & Chris C Holmes, 2020. "A cautionary note on the use of unsupervised machine learning algorithms to characterise malaria parasite population structure from genetic distance matrices," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Peña-Malavera Andrea & Bruno Cecilia & Balzarini Monica & Fernandez Elmer, 2014. "Comparison of algorithms to infer genetic population structure from unlinked molecular markers," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Guangping Huang & Lingyun Song & Xin Du & Xin Huang & Fuwen Wei, 2023. "Evolutionary genomics of camouflage innovation in the orchid mantis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Legried, Brandon & Terhorst, Jonathan, 2022. "Rates of convergence in the two-island and isolation-with-migration models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 16-27.
    14. Jörn Bethune & April Kleppe & Søren Besenbacher, 2022. "A method to build extended sequence context models of point mutations and indels," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Wilton, Peter R. & Baduel, Pierre & Landon, Matthieu M. & Wakeley, John, 2017. "Population structure and coalescence in pedigrees: Comparisons to the structured coalescent and a framework for inference," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Hobolth, Asger & Jensen, Jens Ledet, 2014. "Markovian approximation to the finite loci coalescent with recombination along multiple sequences," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 48-58.
    17. Mateus H. Gouveia & Amy R. Bentley & Thiago P. Leal & Eduardo Tarazona-Santos & Carlos D. Bustamante & Adebowale A. Adeyemo & Charles N. Rotimi & Daniel Shriner, 2023. "Unappreciated subcontinental admixture in Europeans and European Americans and implications for genetic epidemiology studies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Mohammad Hossein Olyaee & Alireza Khanteymoori & Khosrow Khalifeh, 2020. "A chaotic viewpoint-based approach to solve haplotype assembly using hypergraph model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Carmi, Shai & Wilton, Peter R. & Wakeley, John & Pe’er, Itsik, 2014. "A renewal theory approach to IBD sharing," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 35-48.
    20. Kerdoncuff, Elise & Lambert, Amaury & Achaz, Guillaume, 2020. "Testing for population decline using maximal linkage disequilibrium blocks," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 171-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1005703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.