IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1004042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crossover Patterning by the Beam-Film Model: Analysis and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Liangran Zhang
  • Zhangyi Liang
  • John Hutchinson
  • Nancy Kleckner

Abstract

Crossing-over is a central feature of meiosis. Meiotic crossover (CO) sites are spatially patterned along chromosomes. CO-designation at one position disfavors subsequent CO-designation(s) nearby, as described by the classical phenomenon of CO interference. If multiple designations occur, COs tend to be evenly spaced. We have previously proposed a mechanical model by which CO patterning could occur. The central feature of a mechanical mechanism is that communication along the chromosomes, as required for CO interference, can occur by redistribution of mechanical stress. Here we further explore the nature of the beam-film model, its ability to quantitatively explain CO patterns in detail in several organisms, and its implications for three important patterning-related phenomena: CO homeostasis, the fact that the level of zero-CO bivalents can be low (the “obligatory CO”), and the occurrence of non-interfering COs. Relationships to other models are discussed.Author Summary: Spatial patterning is a common feature of biological systems at all length scales, from molecular to multi-organismic. Meiosis is the specialized cellular program in which a diploid cell gives rise to haploid gametes for sexual reproduction. Crossing-over between homologous maternal and paternal chromosomes (homologs) is a central feature of this program, playing a role not only for increasing genetic diversity but also for ensuring regular segregation of homologs at the first meiotic division. The distribution of crossovers (COs) along meiotic chromosomes is a paradigmatic example of spatial patterning. Crossovers occur at different positions in different meiotic nuclei but, nonetheless, tend to be evenly spaced along the chromosomes. We previously-described a mechanical “stress and stress relief” model for CO patterning with an accompanying mathematical description (the “beam-film model”). In this paper we explore the roles of mathematical parameters in this model; show that it can very accurately describe experimental data sets from several organisms, in considerably quantitative depth; and discuss implications of the model for several phenomena that are directly related to crossover patterning, including the features which can ensure that every chromosome always acquires at least one crossover.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangran Zhang & Zhangyi Liang & John Hutchinson & Nancy Kleckner, 2014. "Crossover Patterning by the Beam-Film Model: Analysis and Implications," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1004042
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004042
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004042&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malgorzata Bzymek & Nathaniel H. Thayer & Steve D. Oh & Nancy Kleckner & Neil Hunter, 2010. "Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair," Nature, Nature, vol. 464(7290), pages 937-941, April.
    2. J. Michael Cherry & Catherine Ball & Shuai Weng & Gail Juvik & Rita Schmidt & Caroline Adler & Barbara Dunn & Selina Dwight & Linda Riles & Robert K. Mortimer & David Botstein, 1997. "Genetic and physical maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6632), pages 67-73, May.
    3. Eugenio Mancera & Richard Bourgon & Alessandro Brozzi & Wolfgang Huber & Lars M. Steinmetz, 2008. "High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast," Nature, Nature, vol. 454(7203), pages 479-485, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simone Mozzachiodi & Lorenzo Tattini & Agnes Llored & Agurtzane Irizar & Neža Škofljanc & Melania D’Angiolo & Matteo De Chiara & Benjamin P. Barré & Jia-Xing Yue & Angela Lutazi & Sophie Loeillet & Ra, 2021. "Aborting meiosis allows recombination in sterile diploid yeast hybrids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Taikui Zhang & Weichen Huang & Lin Zhang & De-Zhu Li & Ji Qi & Hong Ma, 2024. "Phylogenomic profiles of whole-genome duplications in Poaceae and landscape of differential duplicate retention and losses among major Poaceae lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Stuart D. Desjardins & James Simmonds & Inna Guterman & Kostya Kanyuka & Amanda J. Burridge & Andrew J. Tock & Eugenio Sanchez-Moran & F. Chris H. Franklin & Ian R. Henderson & Keith J. Edwards & Cris, 2022. "FANCM promotes class I interfering crossovers and suppresses class II non-interfering crossovers in wheat meiosis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Svitlana Tyekucheva & Francesca Chiaromonte, 2008. "Augmenting the bootstrap to analyze high dimensional genomic data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Marcel Ernst & Raphael Mercier & David Zwicker, 2024. "Interference length reveals regularity of crossover placement across species," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Qichao Lian & Victor Solier & Birgit Walkemeier & Stéphanie Durand & Bruno Huettel & Korbinian Schneeberger & Raphael Mercier, 2022. "The megabase-scale crossover landscape is largely independent of sequence divergence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Chinnu Rose Joseph & Sabrina Dusi & Michele Giannattasio & Dana Branzei, 2022. "Rad51-mediated replication of damaged templates relies on monoSUMOylated DDK kinase," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1004042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.