IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0001108.html

Classification of knowledge of fertility period among adolescent girls in East Africa from 2012 to 2022: Machine learning algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Andualem Addisu Birlie
  • Kassahun Dessie Gashu
  • Mulugeta Desalegn Kasaye
  • Ayana Alebachew Muluneh
  • Abdulaziz Kebede Kassaw
  • Hailemariam Kassahun Desalegn
  • Tamir Wondim Desta
  • Shimels Derso Kebede

Abstract

Understanding the time of the menstrual cycle would help women to avoid getting pregnant without the need for surgical, hormonal, or mechanical contraception. Women who do not use contraception and do not know when they are fertile are at a higher risk (17%) of unplanned pregnancy and abortion. Classifying knowledge of fertility periods using machine learning algorithms would help to automate decision-making, produce more precise and accurate classification, and scale up to manage big and complex datasets. Therefore, this study aimed to classify knowledge of the fertility period among adolescent girls in East Africa from 2012 to 2022 using a machine-learning algorithm. A community-based cross-sectional study design was used from 12 East African countries’ DHS datasets spanning 2012–2022. The machine learning algorithms were applied to classify knowledge of the fertility period and identify its predictors using R software and Python, particularly Jupiter Notebook in Anaconda. Data cleaning, one-hot encoding, data splitting, data balancing, and ten-fold cross-validation were performed. Ten machine learning algorithms and SHAP were used to select and interpret the best model. From the 40,664 adolescent girls in East Africa, 13.22% (95% CI: 12.91, 13.54) of participants had knowledge of the fertility period. Logistic regression was found to be the best model for unbalanced training data with 74.38% of an AUC and 82.71% of an accuracy. While random forest outperformed on balanced training data, it achieved 91.12% of an AUC and 83.26% accuracy. The key determinant factors of the knowledge of the fertility period were education level, country, hearing about family planning, hearing about sexually transmitted infections, wealth index, knowledge of any method, and visiting health facilities. Governments, NGOs, policy makers, and researchers can utilize these findings to design targeted interventions for improving adolescents’ reproductive health based on the identified gaps and disparities.Author summary: The purpose of this study was to classify knowledge of the fertility period among adolescent girls in East Africa. Ten machine-learning models were trained, and the random forest model provided the most accurate prediction with an AUC score of 91.12% and an accuracy of 83.26%. Using the SHAP feature importance method, the top ten predictors were identified: education level, country, heard about family planning, heard about sexually transmitted infections, wealth index, knowledge of any method, and visited health facilities. Education level was a primary factor since girls with higher education levels were better prepared to understand reproductive health concepts. Similarly, increased exposure to hearing about family planning and general knowledge about STIs improved knowledge of fertility, again showing that a more extensive health communication strategy has contributed to girls’ foundational knowledge. It is important to note that the wealth index also has an effect on access to media, education, and health services. We saw that girls who demonstrated that they were aware of a contraceptive method or had ever visited a health facility were significantly more likely to understand their fertility period.

Suggested Citation

  • Andualem Addisu Birlie & Kassahun Dessie Gashu & Mulugeta Desalegn Kasaye & Ayana Alebachew Muluneh & Abdulaziz Kebede Kassaw & Hailemariam Kassahun Desalegn & Tamir Wondim Desta & Shimels Derso Kebed, 2026. "Classification of knowledge of fertility period among adolescent girls in East Africa from 2012 to 2022: Machine learning algorithm," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001108
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0001108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0001108&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babbar, Karan & Dev, Pritha, 2021. "Modelling the impact of Ovulatory Cycle Knowledge on the number of children and age of women at first birth," IIMA Working Papers WP 2021-11-04, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    2. Ayodeji Emmanuel Iyanda & Barbara J. Dinkins & Tolulope Osayomi & Temitope Joshua Adeusi & Yongmei Lu & Joseph R. Oppong, 2020. "Fertility knowledge, contraceptive use and unintentional pregnancy in 29 African countries: a cross-sectional study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(4), pages 445-455, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karan Babbar & Supriya Garikipati, 2023. "What socio-demographic factors support disposable vs. sustainable menstrual choices? Evidence from India’s National Family Health Survey-5," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0001108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.