Author
Listed:
- Amy Bucher
- Beenish M Chaudhry
- Jean W Davis
- Katharine Lawrence
- Emily Panza
- Manal Baqer
- Rebecca T Feinstein
- Sherecce A Fields
- Jennifer Huberty
- Deanna M Kaplan
- Isabelle S Kusters
- Frank T Materia
- Susanna Y Park
- Maura Kepper
Abstract
With a renewed focus on health equity in the United States driven by national crises and legislation to improve digital healthcare innovation, there is a need for the designers of digital health tools to take deliberate steps to design for equity in their work. A concrete toolkit of methods to design for health equity is needed to support digital health practitioners in this aim. This narrative review summarizes several health equity frameworks to help digital health practitioners conceptualize the equity dimensions of importance for their work, and then provides design approaches that accommodate an equity focus. Specifically, the Double Diamond Model, the IDEAS framework and toolkit, and community collaboration techniques such as participatory design are explored as mechanisms for practitioners to solicit input from members of underserved groups and better design digital health tools that serve their needs. Each of these design methods requires a deliberate effort by practitioners to infuse health equity into the approach. A series of case studies that use different methods to build in equity considerations are offered to provide examples of how this can be accomplished and demonstrate the range of applications available depending on resources, budget, product maturity, and other factors. We conclude with a call for shared rigor around designing digital health tools that deliver equitable outcomes for members of underserved populations.Author summary: Designers and developers of digital health tools, such as apps or telehealth services, have an opportunity to improve how their products support health equity. After the COVID-19 pandemic, the murder of George Floyd, and the passage of the 21st Century Cures Act, there are several forces in American society bringing attention to historical healthcare inequities and momentum to address them as we develop new products. We recommend practitioners start by consulting health equity frameworks to identify which dimensions, such as race, age, or health status, are most relevant to their product. From there, practitioners can choose established design tools like the Double Diamond Method, the IDEAS framework and toolkit, or community collaboration techniques like participatory design for their product development process and deliberately infuse a health equity focus. To demonstrate how that is possible across contexts, we offer case studies that range from lower-intensity equity research to enduring partnerships with community organizations serving underrepresented user groups. The goals of this paper are to equip practitioners to achieve more equitable outcomes via digital health tools and to contribute to standard methods of adopting an equity focus in digital health work.
Suggested Citation
Amy Bucher & Beenish M Chaudhry & Jean W Davis & Katharine Lawrence & Emily Panza & Manal Baqer & Rebecca T Feinstein & Sherecce A Fields & Jennifer Huberty & Deanna M Kaplan & Isabelle S Kusters & Fr, 2024.
"How to design equitable digital health tools: A narrative review of design tactics, case studies, and opportunities,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-26, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000591
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000591
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Daniel Z Hodson & Yannick Mbarga Etoundi & Sunil Parikh & Yap Boum II, 2023.
"Striving towards true equity in global health: A checklist for bilateral research partnerships,"
PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, January.
- Mosavel, Maghboeba & Ahmed, Rashid & Daniels, Doria & Simon, Christian, 2011.
"Community researchers conducting health disparities research: Ethical and other insights from fieldwork journaling,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 145-152, July.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Enid Schatz & Christie Sennott & Sangeetha Madhavan & Nicole Angotti, 2015.
"Working with teams of "insiders","
Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(12), pages 369-396.
- True, Gala & Alexander, Leslie B. & Fisher, Celia B., 2017.
"Supporting the role of community members employed as research staff: Perspectives of community researchers working in addiction research,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 67-75.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.