IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical time-to-event prediction enhanced by incorporating compatible related outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Gao
  • Yan Cui

Abstract

Accurate time-to-event (TTE) prediction of clinical outcomes from personal biomedical data is essential for precision medicine. It has become increasingly common that clinical datasets contain information for multiple related patient outcomes from comorbid diseases or multifaceted endpoints of a single disease. Various TTE models have been developed to handle competing risks that are related to mutually exclusive events. However, clinical outcomes are often non-competing and can occur at the same time or sequentially. Here we develop TTE prediction models with the capacity of incorporating compatible related clinical outcomes. We test our method on real and synthetic data and find that the incorporation of related auxiliary clinical outcomes can: 1) significantly improve the TTE prediction performance of conventional Cox model while maintaining its interpretability; 2) further improve the performance of the state-of-the-art deep learning based models. While the auxiliary outcomes are utilized for model training, the model deployment is not limited by the availability of the auxiliary outcome data because the auxiliary outcome information is not required for the prediction of the primary outcome once the model is trained.Author summary: The disease outcome of a patient is often characterized by the occurrence of important clinical events such as stroke, heart failure, cancer progression, and death. Prediction of the time to the occurrence of such clinical events is critical for disease prognosis and therapeutic decision. However, accurate time-to-event prediction is a long-standing challenge due to inadequate data and modeling tools. In recent years, the rapid advance in biomedical data collection and artificial intelligence has provided a solid foundation for more sophisticated and accurate time-to-event prediction models. In this work, we develop a machine learning method to incorporate information from related clinical outcomes to improve the accuracy of time-to-event prediction. This method can improve the performance of different time-to-event prediction models including the conventional regression based model and the state-of-the-art deep learning based model. We expect that this new method can be broadly used for complex prognosis problems involving comorbidities and multifaceted disease endpoints.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Gao & Yan Cui, 2022. "Clinical time-to-event prediction enhanced by incorporating compatible related outcomes," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000038
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000038&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Gao & Yan Cui, 2020. "Deep transfer learning for reducing health care disparities arising from biomedical data inequality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Yan Gao & Yan Cui, 2020. "Author Correction: Deep transfer learning for reducing health care disparities arising from biomedical data inequality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Chenxi & Zhang, Jun & Yuan, Hongxia & Gao, Tianlu & Jiang, Huaiguang & Yan, Jing & Wenzhong Gao, David & Wang, Fei-Yue, 2022. "Black swan event small-sample transfer learning (BEST-L) and its case study on electrical power prediction in COVID-19," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Siqiong Yao & Fang Dai & Peng Sun & Weituo Zhang & Biyun Qian & Hui Lu, 2024. "Enhancing the fairness of AI prediction models by Quasi-Pareto improvement among heterogeneous thyroid nodule population," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Tsegahun Manyazewal & Gail Davey & Charlotte Hanlon & Melanie J. Newport & Michael Hopkins & Jenni Wilburn & Sahar Bakhiet & Leon Mutesa & Agumasie Semahegn & Esubalew Assefa & Abebaw Fekadu, 2024. "Innovative technologies to address neglected tropical diseases in African settings with persistent sociopolitical instability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.