IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1013189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptual clustering in auditory streaming

Author

Listed:
  • Nathanael Larigaldie
  • Tim Yates
  • Ulrik R Beierholm

Abstract

Perception is dependent on the ability to separate stimuli from different objects and causes in order to perform inference and further processing. We have models of how the human brain can perform such causal inference for simple binary stimuli (e.g., auditory and visual), but the complexity of the models increases dramatically with more than two stimuli. To characterize human perception with more complex stimuli, we developed a Bayesian inference model that takes into account a potentially unlimited number of stimulus sources: it is general enough to factor in any discrete sequential cues from any modality. Because the model employs a non-parametric prior, increased signal complexity does not necessitate the addition of more parameters. The model not only predicts the number of possible sources, but also specifies the source with which each signal is associated. As a test case, we demonstrate that such a model can explain several phenomena in the auditory stream perception literature, that it provides an excellent fit to experimental data, and that it makes novel predictions that we experimentally confirm. These findings have implications not just for human auditory temporal perception, but for a wide range of perceptual phenomena across unisensory and multisensory stimuli.Author summary: Perceiving the world requires humans to organize perceptual stimuli according to the likely sources that generated them, requiring inference about these sources and their relationship with the generated stimuli. As an example, the sound of two different species of song birds should be segregated in order to better identify them. In this paper we utilize ideas from statistics to propose a way for the mind to do the allocation of stimuli to sources, that is not restricted by the number of stimuli, and that instead combines information dynamically as the complexity grows. We show that this not only qualitatively explains known phenomena in auditory perception, but can also quantitatively explain behavior, and leads to an experimental prediction that we confirm.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathanael Larigaldie & Tim Yates & Ulrik R Beierholm, 2025. "Perceptual clustering in auditory streaming," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-25, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013189
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013189
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013189&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Konrad P Körding & Ulrik Beierholm & Wei Ji Ma & Steven Quartz & Joshua B Tenenbaum & Ladan Shams, 2007. "Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-10, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy A Kalia & Paul R Schrater & Gordon E Legge, 2013. "Combining Path Integration and Remembered Landmarks When Navigating without Vision," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Dimitrije Marković & Jan Gläscher & Peter Bossaerts & John O’Doherty & Stefan J Kiebel, 2015. "Modeling the Evolution of Beliefs Using an Attentional Focus Mechanism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    3. repec:plo:pone00:0003832 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Adam N Sanborn & Ulrik R Beierholm, 2016. "Fast and Accurate Learning When Making Discrete Numerical Estimates," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Jennifer Laura Lee & Wei Ji Ma, 2021. "Point-estimating observer models for latent cause detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-29, October.
    6. Guido Marco Cicchini & Giovanni D’Errico & David Charles Burr, 2022. "Crowding results from optimal integration of visual targets with contextual information," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Peter W Battaglia & Daniel Kersten & Paul R Schrater, 2011. "How Haptic Size Sensations Improve Distance Perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-13, June.
    8. Luigi Acerbi & Kalpana Dokka & Dora E Angelaki & Wei Ji Ma, 2018. "Bayesian comparison of explicit and implicit causal inference strategies in multisensory heading perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-38, July.
    9. Anna-Lena Eckert & Elena Fuehrer & Christina Schmitter & Benjamin Straube & Katja Fiehler & Dominik Endres, 2025. "Modelling sensory attenuation as Bayesian causal inference across two datasets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, January.
    10. repec:plo:pbio00:1002073 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Ksander N de Winkel & Mikhail Katliar & Heinrich H Bülthoff, 2017. "Causal Inference in Multisensory Heading Estimation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. repec:plo:pone00:0183776 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Christoph Kayser & Ladan Shams, 2015. "Multisensory Causal Inference in the Brain," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-7, February.
    14. Jacqueline M Fulvio & C Shawn Green & Paul R Schrater, 2014. "Task-Specific Response Strategy Selection on the Basis of Recent Training Experience," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. David R Wozny & Ulrik R Beierholm & Ladan Shams, 2010. "Probability Matching as a Computational Strategy Used in Perception," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-7, August.
    16. Pedram Daee & Maryam S Mirian & Majid Nili Ahmadabadi, 2014. "Reward Maximization Justifies the Transition from Sensory Selection at Childhood to Sensory Integration at Adulthood," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Patricia Besson & Christophe Bourdin & Lionel Bringoux, 2011. "A Comprehensive Model of Audiovisual Perception: Both Percept and Temporal Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(8), pages 1-11, August.
    18. Wendy J Adams, 2016. "The Development of Audio-Visual Integration for Temporal Judgements," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Tim Genewein & Eduard Hez & Zeynab Razzaghpanah & Daniel A Braun, 2015. "Structure Learning in Bayesian Sensorimotor Integration," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Max Berniker & Martin Voss & Konrad Kording, 2010. "Learning Priors for Bayesian Computations in the Nervous System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-9, September.
    21. Jannes Jegminat & Maya A Jastrzębowska & Matthew V Pachai & Michael H Herzog & Jean-Pascal Pfister, 2020. "Bayesian regression explains how human participants handle parameter uncertainty," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, May.
    22. Jeroen Atsma & Femke Maij & Mathieu Koppen & David E Irwin & W Pieter Medendorp, 2016. "Causal Inference for Spatial Constancy across Saccades," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    23. Marcus Ghosh & Gabriel Béna & Volker Bormuth & Dan F M Goodman, 2024. "Nonlinear fusion is optimal for a wide class of multisensory tasks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1013189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.