Author
Listed:
- Logan Wu
- Christopher M Baker
- Nicholas Tierney
- Kylie Carville
- Jodie McVernon
- Nick Golding
- James M McCaw
- Freya M Shearer
Abstract
Contact tracing is an important public health measure used to reduce transmission of infectious diseases. Contact tracers typically conduct telephone interviews with cases to identify contacts and direct them to quarantine, with the aim of preventing onward transmission. However, in situations where caseloads exceed the capacity of the public health system, timely interviews may not be feasible for all cases. Here we present a modelling framework for assessing the impact of different case interview prioritisation strategies on disease transmission. Our model is based on Australian contact tracing procedures and informed by contact tracing data on COVID-19 cases notified in Australia from 2020 to 2021. Our results demonstrate that last-in-first-out strategies (where cases with the most recent swab or notification dates are interviewed first) are more effective at reducing transmission than first-in-first-out strategies (where cases with the oldest swab or notification dates are interviewed first) or strategies with no explicit prioritisation. To maximise the public health benefit from a given case interview capacity, public health practitioners may consider our findings when designing case interview prioritisation protocols for outbreak response.Author summary: Contact tracing can be an effective strategy for controlling infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Contacts of cases, identified through case interviews, may be directed to quarantine before they become infectious, interrupting chains of disease transmission. Contact tracing is limited by available resources, including the number of case interviews that can be conducted per day. When contact tracing systems have exceeded workforce capacity, it may not be possible to interview all cases in a timely manner. Hence, an approach for prioritising cases for interview is necessary to maximise transmission reduction within the available interview capacity. We use a simulation modelling framework to quantify the impact of different interview prioritisation strategies on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We find that prioritising the most recently identified cases for contact tracing increases the impact of test-trace-isolate-quarantine responses, since late case finding results in diminishing returns on transmission reduction. Contact tracing management systems should be designed to implement a prioritisation strategy for case interviews that achieves the greatest reduction in transmission, among other system objectives, for a given interview capacity.
Suggested Citation
Logan Wu & Christopher M Baker & Nicholas Tierney & Kylie Carville & Jodie McVernon & Nick Golding & James M McCaw & Freya M Shearer, 2025.
"Quantifying the impact of contact tracing interview prioritisation strategies on disease transmission: A modelling study,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-14, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012906
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012906
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.