Author
Listed:
- Kendrick Kay
- Jacob S Prince
- Thomas Gebhart
- Greta Tuckute
- Jingyang Zhou
- Thomas Naselaris
- Heiko H Schütt
Abstract
Measurements of neural responses to identically repeated experimental events often exhibit large amounts of variability. This noise is distinct from signal, operationally defined as the average expected response across repeated trials for each given event. Accurately distinguishing signal from noise is important, as each is a target that is worthy of study (many believe noise reflects important aspects of brain function) and it is important not to confuse one for the other. Here, we describe a principled modeling approach in which response measurements are explicitly modeled as the sum of samples from multivariate signal and noise distributions. In our proposed method—termed Generative Modeling of Signal and Noise (GSN)—the signal distribution is estimated by subtracting the estimated noise distribution from the estimated data distribution. Importantly, GSN improves estimates of the signal distribution, but does not provide improved estimates of responses to individual events. We validate GSN using ground-truth simulations and show that it compares favorably with related methods. We also demonstrate the application of GSN to empirical fMRI data to illustrate a simple consequence of GSN: by disentangling signal and noise components in neural responses, GSN denoises principal components analysis and improves estimates of dimensionality. We end by discussing other situations that may benefit from GSN’s characterization of signal and noise, such as estimation of noise ceilings for computational models of neural activity. A code toolbox for GSN is provided with both MATLAB and Python implementations.Author summary: The neural response to a given experimental manipulation typically exhibits high degree of variability from trial to trial. This ‘noise’ is ubiquitous and may play an important role in brain computation (though its precise role is not yet clear). At the same time, neuroscientists are also interested in studying what is consistent across trials, known as the ‘signal’. In this work, we tackle the challenge of separating signal and noise in neural response measurements. We introduce a statistical framework, termed Generative Modeling of Signal and Noise (GSN), in which the data are modeled as a sum of samples from an underlying signal distribution and underlying noise distribution. After providing an algorithm to estimate the parameters of this model, we show how GSN delivers benefits such as denoising the results of principal components analysis and improving estimates of dimensionality. To make it easy to apply GSN, we also provide a code toolbox implementing the method.
Suggested Citation
Kendrick Kay & Jacob S Prince & Thomas Gebhart & Greta Tuckute & Jingyang Zhou & Thomas Naselaris & Heiko H Schütt, 2025.
"Disentangling signal and noise in neural responses through generative modeling,"
PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(7), pages 1-33, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012092
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012092
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1012092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.