IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new paradigm considering multicellular adhesion, repulsion and attraction represent diverse cellular tile patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Jose A Carrillo
  • Hideki Murakawa
  • Makoto Sato
  • Miaoxing Wang

Abstract

Cell sorting by differential adhesion is one of the basic mechanisms explaining spatial organization of neurons in early stage brain development of fruit flies. The columnar arrangements of neurons determine the large-scale patterns in the fly visual center. Experimental studies indicate that hexagonal configurations regularly appear in the fly compound eye, which is connected to the visual center by photoreceptor axons, while tetragonal configurations can be induced in mutants. We need a mathematical framework to study the mechanisms of such a transition between hexagonal and tetragonal arrangements. Here, we propose a new mathematical model based on macroscopic approximations of agent-based models that produces a similar behavior changing from hexagonal to tetragonal steady configurations when medium-range repulsion and longer-range attraction between individuals are incorporated in previous successful models for cell sorting based on adhesion and volume constraints. We analyze the angular configurations of these patterns based on angle summary statistics and compare between experimental data and parameter fitted ARA (Adhesion-Repulsion-Attraction) models showing that intermediate patterns between hexagonal and tetragonal configuration are common in experimental data as well as in our ARA mathematical model. Our studies indicate an overall qualitative agreement of ARA models in tile patterning and pave the way for their quantitative studies. Our study opens up a new avenue to explore tile pattern transitions, found not only in the column arrangement in the brain, but also in the other related biological processes.Author summary: Biological tile patterns often exhibit hexagonal patterns, such as those seen in insect compound eyes, columnar structures in the brain, auditory epithelial cells, and lobules in the liver, which are thought to be due to physical constraints. Indeed, hexagonal tile patterns minimize the potential energy based on a standard physical potential of particles. In this study, we focus on the arrangement of the columnar structure in the fly brain. Our quantitative method to analyze the symmetric distribution patterns of particles shows that their distribution patterns are not exactly hexagonal or tetragonal. We therefore propose a new mathematical model, the ARA model, which takes into account short-range adhesion, medium-range repulsion and long-range attraction and reproduces hexagonal, tetragonal and intermediate patterns. Finally, the ARA model could reproduce the changes in column arrangement upon decreasing and increasing the expression level of N-cadherin. The current study provides a mathematical basis for studying a wide range of tile patterns found in biological and non-biological systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose A Carrillo & Hideki Murakawa & Makoto Sato & Miaoxing Wang, 2025. "A new paradigm considering multicellular adhesion, repulsion and attraction represent diverse cellular tile patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011909
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011909
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011909&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takashi Hayashi & Richard W. Carthew, 2004. "Surface mechanics mediate pattern formation in the developing retina," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7009), pages 647-652, October.
    2. Chuyan Liu & Olena Trush & Xujun Han & Miaoxing Wang & Rie Takayama & Tetsuo Yasugi & Takashi Hayashi & Makoto Sato, 2020. "Dscam1 establishes the columnar units through lineage-dependent repulsion between sister neurons in the fly brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Matthew S. Maisak & Juergen Haag & Georg Ammer & Etienne Serbe & Matthias Meier & Aljoscha Leonhardt & Tabea Schilling & Armin Bahl & Gerald M. Rubin & Aljoscha Nern & Barry J. Dickson & Dierk F. Reif, 2013. "A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors," Nature, Nature, vol. 500(7461), pages 212-216, August.
    4. Matthew A. Heinrich & Ricard Alert & Abraham E. Wolf & Andrej Košmrlj & Daniel J. Cohen, 2022. "Self-assembly of tessellated tissue sheets by expansion and collision," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haque, Ruhul A.I. & Mitra, Atish J. & Tarafdar, Sujata & Dutta, Tapati, 2023. "Evolution of polygonal crack patterns in mud when subjected to repeated wetting–drying cycles," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Dongpeng Hu & Ichiro Masai, 2025. "Dscamb regulates cone mosaic formation in zebrafish via filopodium-mediated homotypic recognition," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Kit D. Longden & Edward M. Rogers & Aljoscha Nern & Heather Dionne & Michael B. Reiser, 2023. "Different spectral sensitivities of ON- and OFF-motion pathways enhance the detection of approaching color objects in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002115 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:plo:pcbi00:1000841 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.