IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning efficient representations of environmental priors in working memory

Author

Listed:
  • Tahra L Eissa
  • Zachary P Kilpatrick

Abstract

Experience shapes our expectations and helps us learn the structure of the environment. Inference models render such learning as a gradual refinement of the observer’s estimate of the environmental prior. For instance, when retaining an estimate of an object’s features in working memory, learned priors may bias the estimate in the direction of common feature values. Humans display such biases when retaining color estimates on short time intervals. We propose that these systematic biases emerge from modulation of synaptic connectivity in a neural circuit based on the experienced stimulus history, shaping the persistent and collective neural activity that encodes the stimulus estimate. Resulting neural activity attractors are aligned to common stimulus values. Using recently published human response data from a delayed-estimation task in which stimuli (colors) were drawn from a heterogeneous distribution that did not necessarily correspond with reported population biases, we confirm that most subjects’ response distributions are better described by experience-dependent learning models than by models with fixed biases. This work suggests systematic limitations in working memory reflect efficient representations of inferred environmental structure, providing new insights into how humans integrate environmental knowledge into their cognitive strategies.Author summary: Working memory is known to play an important role in cognition, allowing us to maintain information in our memory for short periods without a constant stimuli. However, humans display limitations in working memory, such as recalling certain stimuli more frequently and accurately than others. We propose that these recall biases are based on our experience of common stimuli in our environment and driven by goal of efficiently reducing error by remembering common stimuli with more accuracy than rare stimuli. Here, we develop a model that updates an observer’s beliefs about the statistics of stimuli in an environment based on experience, biasing working memory recall such that common stimuli are remembered better. We then show that most human subjects’ responses from a previously published working memory task are better matched to a model that learns in an experience-dependent way compared to models with fixed biases. Finally, we identify a plausible neural mechanism for environmental experience-updating to show how the brain could implement this efficient strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Tahra L Eissa & Zachary P Kilpatrick, 2023. "Learning efficient representations of environmental priors in working memory," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(11), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011622
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011622
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011622&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pcbi00:1008128 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daryl Fougnie & Jordan W. Suchow & George A. Alvarez, 2012. "Variability in the quality of visual working memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8, January.
    3. Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2014. "Formation and maintenance of neuronal assemblies through synaptic plasticity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liqiang Huang, 2025. "Comprehensive exploration of visual working memory mechanisms using large-scale behavioral experiment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    3. Mizusaki, Beatriz E.P. & Agnes, Everton J. & Erichsen, Rubem & Brunnet, Leonardo G., 2017. "Learning and retrieval behavior in recurrent neural networks with pre-synaptic dependent homeostatic plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 279-286.
    4. Loic Matthey & Paul M Bays & Peter Dayan, 2015. "A Probabilistic Palimpsest Model of Visual Short-term Memory," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-34, January.
    5. repec:plo:pcbi00:1004895 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Michele N. Insanally & Badr F. Albanna & Jade Toth & Brian DePasquale & Saba Shokat Fadaei & Trisha Gupta & Olivia Lombardi & Kishore Kuchibhotla & Kanaka Rajan & Robert C. Froemke, 2024. "Contributions of cortical neuron firing patterns, synaptic connectivity, and plasticity to task performance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Vahid Rostami & Thomas Rost & Felix Johannes Schmitt & Sacha Jennifer Albada & Alexa Riehle & Martin Paul Nawrot, 2024. "Spiking attractor model of motor cortex explains modulation of neural and behavioral variability by prior target information," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.