IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controlling target brain regions by optimal selection of input nodes

Author

Listed:
  • Karan Kabbur Hanumanthappa Manjunatha
  • Giorgia Baron
  • Danilo Benozzo
  • Erica Silvestri
  • Maurizio Corbetta
  • Alessandro Chiuso
  • Alessandra Bertoldo
  • Samir Suweis
  • Michele Allegra

Abstract

The network control theory framework holds great potential to inform neurostimulation experiments aimed at inducing desired activity states in the brain. However, the current applicability of the framework is limited by inappropriate modeling of brain dynamics, and an overly ambitious focus on whole-brain activity control. In this work, we leverage recent progress in linear modeling of brain dynamics (effective connectivity) and we exploit the concept of target controllability to focus on the control of a single region or a small subnetwork of nodes. We discuss when control may be possible with a reasonably low energy cost and few stimulation loci, and give general predictions on where to stimulate depending on the subset of regions one wishes to control. Importantly, using the robustly asymmetric effective connectome instead of the symmetric structural connectome (as in previous research), we highlight the fundamentally different roles in- and out-hubs have in the control problem, and the relevance of inhibitory connections. The large degree of inter-individual variation in the effective connectome implies that the control problem is best formulated at the individual level, but we discuss to what extent group results may still prove useful.Author summary: Compared to healthy individuals, patients suffering from neurological diseases generally present widely altered brain activity patterns. A promising way to help these people restore a normal brain activity balance is using brain stimulation. As brain areas are interconnected in an intricate web, locally stimulating one or more brain areas can trigger effects across several distant locations, thus evoking a complex response. To achieve a specific response, one should know where (which stimulation sites) to stimulate. Several authors have proposed to solve this puzzle by using a computational model of brain activity together with control theory, a mathematical paradigm to design perturbations with desired effects on a dynamical system. Using an accurate model of brain activity fitted to experimental data from functional magnetic resonance imaging, we show that evoking arbitrary activity patterns in the whole brain requires stimulating a large number of brain areas simultaneously, which is unfeasible with current technology. One can nevertheless focus on a more affordable objective, controlling the activity of a small set of target regions. We discuss how to optimally select stimulation sites (so as to minimize the stimulation intensity) depending on the choice of the target regions, and on the structure of the brain connectivity network.

Suggested Citation

  • Karan Kabbur Hanumanthappa Manjunatha & Giorgia Baron & Danilo Benozzo & Erica Silvestri & Maurizio Corbetta & Alessandro Chiuso & Alessandra Bertoldo & Samir Suweis & Michele Allegra, 2024. "Controlling target brain regions by optimal selection of input nodes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-30, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011274
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011274
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011274&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weidong Cai & Srikanth Ryali & Ramkrishna Pasumarthy & Viswanath Talasila & Vinod Menon, 2021. "Dynamic causal brain circuits during working memory and their functional controllability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Evelyn Tang & Chad Giusti & Graham L. Baum & Shi Gu & Eli Pollock & Ari E. Kahn & David R. Roalf & Tyler M. Moore & Kosha Ruparel & Ruben C. Gur & Raquel E. Gur & Theodore D. Satterthwaite & Danielle , 2017. "Developmental increases in white matter network controllability support a growing diversity of brain dynamics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Matthieu Gilson & Ruben Moreno-Bote & Adrián Ponce-Alvarez & Petra Ritter & Gustavo Deco, 2016. "Estimation of Directed Effective Connectivity from fMRI Functional Connectivity Hints at Asymmetries of Cortical Connectome," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-30, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tam, H.C. & Ching, Emily S.C. & Lai, Pik-Yin, 2018. "Reconstructing networks from dynamics with correlated noise," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 502(C), pages 106-122.
    2. Gustavo Deco & Diego Vidaurre & Morten L. Kringelbach, 2021. "Revisiting the global workspace orchestrating the hierarchical organization of the human brain," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 497-511, April.
    3. Matthieu Gilson & David Dahmen & Rubén Moreno-Bote & Andrea Insabato & Moritz Helias, 2020. "The covariance perceptron: A new paradigm for classification and processing of time series in recurrent neuronal networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-38, October.
    4. Zhiyao Gao & Katherine Duberg & Stacie L. Warren & Li Zheng & Stephen P. Hinshaw & Vinod Menon & Weidong Cai, 2025. "Reduced temporal and spatial stability of neural activity patterns predict cognitive control deficits in children with ADHD," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Huili Sun & Rongtao Jiang & Wei Dai & Alexander J. Dufford & Stephanie Noble & Marisa N. Spann & Shi Gu & Dustin Scheinost, 2023. "Network controllability of structural connectomes in the neonatal brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. S. Parker Singleton & Andrea I. Luppi & Robin L. Carhart-Harris & Josephine Cruzat & Leor Roseman & David J. Nutt & Gustavo Deco & Morten L. Kringelbach & Emmanuel A. Stamatakis & Amy Kuceyeski, 2022. "Receptor-informed network control theory links LSD and psilocybin to a flattening of the brain’s control energy landscape," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Jonathan Schiefer & Alexander Niederbühl & Volker Pernice & Carolin Lennartz & Jürgen Hennig & Pierre LeVan & Stefan Rotter, 2018. "From correlation to causation: Estimating effective connectivity from zero-lag covariances of brain signals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Vinod Menon & Domenic Cerri & Byeongwook Lee & Rui Yuan & Sung-Ho Lee & Yen-Yu Ian Shih, 2023. "Optogenetic stimulation of anterior insular cortex neurons in male rats reveals causal mechanisms underlying suppression of the default mode network by the salience network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Colin W. Hoy & David R. Quiroga-Martinez & Eduardo Sandoval & David King-Stephens & Kenneth D. Laxer & Peter Weber & Jack J. Lin & Robert T. Knight, 2023. "Asymmetric coding of reward prediction errors in human insula and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Disheng Tang & Joel Zylberberg & Xiaoxuan Jia & Hannah Choi, 2024. "Stimulus type shapes the topology of cellular functional networks in mouse visual cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.