IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1009208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of natural selection on the propagation of protein expression noise to bacterial growth

Author

Listed:
  • Laurens H J Krah
  • Rutger Hermsen

Abstract

In bacterial cells, protein expression is a highly stochastic process. Gene expression noise moreover propagates through the cell and adds to fluctuations in the cellular growth rate. A common intuition is that, due to their relatively high noise amplitudes, proteins with a low mean expression level are the most important drivers of fluctuations in physiological variables. In this work, we challenge this intuition by considering the effect of natural selection on noise propagation. Mathematically, the contribution of each protein species to the noise in the growth rate depends on two factors: the noise amplitude of the protein’s expression level, and the sensitivity of the growth rate to fluctuations in that protein’s concentration. We argue that natural selection, while shaping mean abundances to increase the mean growth rate, also affects cellular sensitivities. In the limit in which cells grow optimally fast, the growth rate becomes most sensitive to fluctuations in highly abundant proteins. This causes abundant proteins to overall contribute strongly to the noise in the growth rate, despite their low noise levels. We further explore this result in an experimental data set of protein abundances, and test key assumptions in an evolving, stochastic toy model of cellular growth.Author summary: Gene expression in bacterial cells is intrinsically stochastic: copy numbers of all proteins vary between genetically identical cells, even in a homogeneous environment. Such noise in gene expression affects metabolic fluxes and even propagates to the cellular level. Indeed, also the growth rate of individual cells, an important proxy for fitness, fluctuates strongly. This beckons the question as to which protein species contribute most to the noise in the cell’s growth rate. We here derive general mathematical predictions stating that if cells have been optimised by evolution to grow fast, abundant protein species contribute most to the noise in the growth rate. This result is counter-intuitive, because the noise levels in the expression of those highly expressed proteins are small.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurens H J Krah & Rutger Hermsen, 2021. "The effect of natural selection on the propagation of protein expression noise to bacterial growth," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009208
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009208
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009208&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philipp Thomas & Guillaume Terradot & Vincent Danos & Andrea Y. Weiße, 2018. "Sources, propagation and consequences of stochasticity in cellular growth," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Dai & Shuyu Zheng & Matías M. Falco & Jie Bao & Johanna Eriksson & Sanna Pikkusaari & Sofia Forstén & Jing Jiang & Wenyu Wang & Luping Gao & Fernando Perez-Villatoro & Olli Dufva & Khalid Saeed & , 2024. "Tracing back primed resistance in cancer via sister cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1009208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.