IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can subjective pain be inferred from objective physiological data? Evidence from patients with sickle cell disease

Author

Listed:
  • Mark J Panaggio
  • Daniel M Abrams
  • Fan Yang
  • Tanvi Banerjee
  • Nirmish R Shah

Abstract

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience lifelong struggles with both chronic and acute pain, often requiring medical interventMaion. Pain can be managed with medications, but dosages must balance the goal of pain mitigation against the risks of tolerance, addiction and other adverse effects. Setting appropriate dosages requires knowledge of a patient’s subjective pain, but collecting pain reports from patients can be difficult for clinicians and disruptive for patients, and is only possible when patients are awake and communicative. Here we investigate methods for estimating SCD patients’ pain levels indirectly using vital signs that are routinely collected and documented in medical records. Using machine learning, we develop both sequential and non-sequential probabilistic models that can be used to infer pain levels or changes in pain from sequences of these physiological measures. We demonstrate that these models outperform null models and that objective physiological data can be used to inform estimates for subjective pain.Author summary: Understanding subjective human pain remains a major challenge. If objective data could be used in place of reported pain levels, it could reduce patient burdens and enable the collection of much larger data sets that could deepen our understanding of causes of pain and allow for accurate forecasting and more effective pain management. Here we apply two machine learning approaches to data from patients with sickle cell disease, who often experience debilitating pain crises. Using vital sign data routinely collected in hospital settings including respiratory rate, heart rate, and blood pressure and amidst the real-world challenges of irregular timing, missing data, and inter-patient variation, we demonstrate that these models outperform baseline models in estimating subjective pain, distinguishing between typical and atypical pain levels, and detecting changes in pain. Once trained, these types of models could be used to improve pain estimates in real time in the absence of direct pain reports.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark J Panaggio & Daniel M Abrams & Fan Yang & Tanvi Banerjee & Nirmish R Shah, 2021. "Can subjective pain be inferred from objective physiological data? Evidence from patients with sickle cell disease," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008542
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008542
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008542
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008542&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008542?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sascha Gruss & Roi Treister & Philipp Werner & Harald C Traue & Stephen Crawcour & Adriano Andrade & Steffen Walter, 2015. "Pain Intensity Recognition Rates via Biopotential Feature Patterns with Support Vector Machines," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.