IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ad hoc efforts for advancing data science education

Author

Listed:
  • Orianna DeMasi
  • Alexandra Paxton
  • Kevin Koy

Abstract

With increasing demand for training in data science, extracurricular or “ad hoc” education efforts have emerged to help individuals acquire relevant skills and expertise. Although extracurricular efforts already exist for many computationally intensive disciplines, their support of data science education has significantly helped in coping with the speed of innovation in data science practice and formal curricula. While the proliferation of ad hoc efforts is an indication of their popularity, less has been documented about the needs that they are designed to meet, the limitations that they face, and practical suggestions for holding successful efforts. To holistically understand the role of different ad hoc formats for data science, we surveyed organizers of ad hoc data science education efforts to understand how organizers perceived the events to have gone—including areas of strength and areas requiring growth. We also gathered recommendations from these past events for future organizers. Our results suggest that the perceived benefits of ad hoc efforts go beyond developing technical skills and may provide continued benefit in conjunction with formal curricula, which warrants further investigation. As increasing numbers of researchers from computational fields with a history of complex data become involved with ad hoc efforts to share their skills, the lessons learned that we extract from the surveys will provide concrete suggestions for the practitioner-leaders interested in creating, improving, and sustaining future efforts.Author summary: Large datasets are becoming integral to society broadly and to biological sciences in particular. As a result, demand for sophisticated data skills and experience has skyrocketed and left some individuals scrambling to cross-train and acquire more computational skills. While universities are racing to develop formal curricula to meet this demand, diverse informal efforts have emerged to fill the immediate demand for skills and experience. These “ad hoc” efforts have been playing a vital role in data science education, especially for domain scientists. While some studies have shown specific ad hoc formats to have considerable impact, few studies have focused on these efforts holistically. Here, we survey effort organizers from leading data science institutes and collect lessons learned. We find that efforts are commonly reported to successfully provide opportunities in difficult areas where curricula could improve, such as providing approachable introductions to new skills, increasing diversity of backgrounds, and fostering heterogeneous communities. However, efforts also report challenges fulfilling diverse needs and offer suggestions. In total, the lessons that we collect from these efforts are useful to improve future ad hoc efforts and to inform formal programs, which may be looking for inspiration to design innovative educational formats.

Suggested Citation

  • Orianna DeMasi & Alexandra Paxton & Kevin Koy, 2020. "Ad hoc efforts for advancing data science education," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007695
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007695
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007695&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Baumer, 2015. "A Data Science Course for Undergraduates: Thinking With Data," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(4), pages 334-342, November.
    2. Mine Çetinkaya-Rundel & Colin Rundel, 2018. "Infrastructure and Tools for Teaching Computing Throughout the Statistical Curriculum," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(1), pages 58-65, January.
    3. Shoaib Sufi & Aleksandra Nenadic & Raniere Silva & Beth Duckles & Iveta Simera & Jennifer A de Beyer & Caroline Struthers & Terhi Nurmikko-Fuller & Louisa Bellis & Wadud Miah & Adriana Wilde & Iain Em, 2018. "Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Emily A Lescak & Kate M O’Neill & Giovanna M Collu & Subhamoy Das, 2019. "Ten simple rules for providing a meaningful research experience to high school students," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cameron Mura & Mike Chalupa & Abigail M Newbury & Jack Chalupa & Philip E Bourne, 2020. "Ten simple rules for starting research in your late teens," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-11, November.
    2. The Editors, 2018. "Reviews of Books and Teaching Materials," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(2), pages 206-212, April.
    3. Quinn, Barry, 2022. "Teaching Open Science Analytics in the Age of Financial Technology," QBS Working Paper Series 2022/01, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Business School.
    4. Roger W. Hoerl & Ronald D. Snee, 2017. "Statistical Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 209-219, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.