IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A simulation of the random and directed motion of dendritic cells in chemokine fields

Author

Listed:
  • Avery Parr
  • Nicholas R Anderson
  • Daniel A Hammer

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most effective professional antigen-presenting cell. They ferry antigen from the extremities to T cells and are essential for the initiation of an adaptive immune response. Despite interest in how DCs respond to chemical stimuli, there have been few attempts to model DC migration. In this paper, we simulate the motility of DCs by modeling the generation of forces by filopodia and a force balance on the cell. The direction of fliopodial extension is coupled to differential occupancy of cognate chemokine receptors across the cell. Our model simulates chemokinesis and chemotaxis in a variety of chemical and mechanical environments. Simulated DCs undergoing chemokinesis were measured to have a speed of 5.1 ± 0.07 μm·min-1 and a persistence time of 3.2 ± 0.46 min, consistent with experiment. Cells undergoing chemotaxis exhibited a stronger chemotactic response when exposed to lower average chemokine concentrations, also consistent with experiment. We predicted that when placed in two opposing gradients, cells will cluster in a line, which we call the “line of equistimulation;” this clustering has also been observed. We calculated the effect of varying gradient steepness on the line of equistimulation, with steeper gradients resulting in tighter clustering. Moreover, gradients are found to be most potent when cells are in a gradient of chemokine whose mean concentration is close to the binding of the Kd to the receptor, and least potent when the mean concentration is 0.1Kd. Comparing our simulations to experiment, we can give a quantitative measure of the strength of certain chemokines relative to others. Assigning the signal of CCL19 binding CCR7 a baseline strength of 1, we found CCL21 binding CCR7 had a strength of 0.28, and CXCL12 binding CXCR4 had a strength of 0.30. These differences emerge despite both chemokines having virtually the same Kd, suggesting a mechanism of signal amplification in DCs requiring further study.Author summary: Dendritic cells harvest and display antigen to other immune cells, and motility is essential to their function. Dendritic cells use filopodia to pull themselves forward, and orient their filopodia based on signals received from chemokines. We developed a model of dendritic cell motion based on a force balance, in which pulling from filopodia (calculated from a well-established model of filopodial adhesion-clutch dynamics) is counterbalanced by adhesive friction, and where the angular orientation of filopodia is based on the strength of chemotactic signal. The model can explain directional motion in chemotactic gradients, as well as the effect of superposition of coincident gradients of chemokine on chemotaxis. The model also identifies conditions in which dendritic cells can be focused at a single location when confronted with countergradients of chemokine. The model makes specific prediction regarding dendritic cell motion and defines conditions for the design of extracorporeal devices for focusing the position of dendritic cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Avery Parr & Nicholas R Anderson & Daniel A Hammer, 2019. "A simulation of the random and directed motion of dendritic cells in chemokine fields," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007295
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007295&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin L. Bangasser & Ghaidan A. Shamsan & Clarence E. Chan & Kwaku N. Opoku & Erkan Tüzel & Benjamin W. Schlichtmann & Jesse A. Kasim & Benjamin J. Fuller & Brannon R. McCullough & Steven S. Rosenf, 2017. "Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahmetullah Varol & Zeynep Karavelioglu & Sevde Omeroglu & Gizem Aydemir & Aslihan Karadag & Hanife E. Meco & Ali A. Demircali & Abdurrahim Yilmaz & Gizem C. Kocal & Gulsum Gencoglan & Muhammed E. Oru, 2022. "Acousto-holographic reconstruction of whole-cell stiffness maps," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Matthew R. Pawlak & Adam T. Smiley & Maria Paz Ramirez & Marcus D. Kelly & Ghaidan A. Shamsan & Sarah M. Anderson & Branden A. Smeester & David A. Largaespada & David J. Odde & Wendy R. Gordon, 2023. "RAD-TGTs: high-throughput measurement of cellular mechanotype via rupture and delivery of DNA tension probes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.