IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting and Removing Inconsistencies between Experimental Data and Signaling Network Topologies Using Integer Linear Programming on Interaction Graphs

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis N Melas
  • Regina Samaga
  • Leonidas G Alexopoulos
  • Steffen Klamt

Abstract

Cross-referencing experimental data with our current knowledge of signaling network topologies is one central goal of mathematical modeling of cellular signal transduction networks. We present a new methodology for data-driven interrogation and training of signaling networks. While most published methods for signaling network inference operate on Bayesian, Boolean, or ODE models, our approach uses integer linear programming (ILP) on interaction graphs to encode constraints on the qualitative behavior of the nodes. These constraints are posed by the network topology and their formulation as ILP allows us to predict the possible qualitative changes (up, down, no effect) of the activation levels of the nodes for a given stimulus. We provide four basic operations to detect and remove inconsistencies between measurements and predicted behavior: (i) find a topology-consistent explanation for responses of signaling nodes measured in a stimulus-response experiment (if none exists, find the closest explanation); (ii) determine a minimal set of nodes that need to be corrected to make an inconsistent scenario consistent; (iii) determine the optimal subgraph of the given network topology which can best reflect measurements from a set of experimental scenarios; (iv) find possibly missing edges that would improve the consistency of the graph with respect to a set of experimental scenarios the most. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed approach by interrogating a manually curated interaction graph model of EGFR/ErbB signaling against a library of high-throughput phosphoproteomic data measured in primary hepatocytes. Our methods detect interactions that are likely to be inactive in hepatocytes and provide suggestions for new interactions that, if included, would significantly improve the goodness of fit. Our framework is highly flexible and the underlying model requires only easily accessible biological knowledge. All related algorithms were implemented in a freely available toolbox SigNetTrainer making it an appealing approach for various applications.Author Summary: Cellular signal transduction is orchestrated by communication networks of signaling proteins commonly depicted on signaling pathway maps. However, each cell type may have distinct variants of signaling pathways, and wiring diagrams are often altered in disease states. The identification of truly active signaling topologies based on experimental data is therefore one key challenge in systems biology of cellular signaling. We present a new framework for training signaling networks based on interaction graphs (IG). In contrast to complex modeling formalisms, IG capture merely the known positive and negative edges between the components. This basic information, however, already sets hard constraints on the possible qualitative behaviors of the nodes when perturbing the network. Our approach uses Integer Linear Programming to encode these constraints and to predict the possible changes (down, neutral, up) of the activation levels of the involved players for a given experiment. Based on this formulation we developed several algorithms for detecting and removing inconsistencies between measurements and network topology. Demonstrated by EGFR/ErbB signaling in hepatocytes, our approach delivers direct conclusions on edges that are likely inactive or missing relative to canonical pathway maps. Such information drives the further elucidation of signaling network topologies under normal and pathological phenotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis N Melas & Regina Samaga & Leonidas G Alexopoulos & Steffen Klamt, 2013. "Detecting and Removing Inconsistencies between Experimental Data and Signaling Network Topologies Using Integer Linear Programming on Interaction Graphs," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003204
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003204
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003204&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Mitsos & Ioannis N Melas & Paraskeuas Siminelakis & Aikaterini D Chairakaki & Julio Saez-Rodriguez & Leonidas G Alexopoulos, 2009. "Identifying Drug Effects via Pathway Alterations using an Integer Linear Programming Optimization Formulation on Phosphoproteomic Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Melody K Morris & Julio Saez-Rodriguez & David C Clarke & Peter K Sorger & Douglas A Lauffenburger, 2011. "Training Signaling Pathway Maps to Biochemical Data with Constrained Fuzzy Logic: Quantitative Analysis of Liver Cell Responses to Inflammatory Stimuli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johan Kerkhofs & Liesbet Geris, 2015. "A Semiquantitative Framework for Gene Regulatory Networks: Increasing the Time and Quantitative Resolution of Boolean Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongwei Shao & Tao Peng & Zhiwei Ji & Jing Su & Xiaobo Zhou, 2013. "Systematically Studying Kinase Inhibitor Induced Signaling Network Signatures by Integrating Both Therapeutic and Side Effects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Federica Eduati & Alberto Corradin & Barbara Di Camillo & Gianna Toffolo, 2010. "A Boolean Approach to Linear Prediction for Signaling Network Modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(9), pages 1-6, September.
    3. Evan J Molinelli & Anil Korkut & Weiqing Wang & Martin L Miller & Nicholas P Gauthier & Xiaohong Jing & Poorvi Kaushik & Qin He & Gordon Mills & David B Solit & Christine A Pratilas & Martin Weigt & A, 2013. "Perturbation Biology: Inferring Signaling Networks in Cellular Systems," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Zebian, Hussam & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Pressurized oxy-coal combustion: Ideally flexible to uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 513-526.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0100177 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Vladimir Dobrić & Pavle Milošević & Aleksandar Rakićević & Bratislav Petrović & Ana Poledica, 2017. "Interpolative Boolean Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, October.
    7. Rohith Palli & Mukta G Palshikar & Juilee Thakar, 2019. "Executable pathway analysis using ensemble discrete-state modeling for large-scale data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, September.
    8. Qian Wan & Ranadip Pal, 2014. "An Ensemble Based Top Performing Approach for NCI-DREAM Drug Sensitivity Prediction Challenge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Stefan Balabanov & Thomas Wilhelm & Simone Venz & Gunhild Keller & Christian Scharf & Heike Pospisil & Melanie Braig & Christine Barett & Carsten Bokemeyer & Reinhard Walther & Tim H Brümmendorf & And, 2013. "Combination of a Proteomics Approach and Reengineering of Meso Scale Network Models for Prediction of Mode-of-Action for Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Johan Kerkhofs & Liesbet Geris, 2015. "A Semiquantitative Framework for Gene Regulatory Networks: Increasing the Time and Quantitative Resolution of Boolean Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    11. Zhiwei Ji & Jing Su & Chenglin Liu & Hongyan Wang & Deshuang Huang & Xiaobo Zhou, 2014. "Integrating Genomics and Proteomics Data to Predict Drug Effects Using Binary Linear Programming," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    12. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003795 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Melody K Morris & Julio Saez-Rodriguez & David C Clarke & Peter K Sorger & Douglas A Lauffenburger, 2011. "Training Signaling Pathway Maps to Biochemical Data with Constrained Fuzzy Logic: Quantitative Analysis of Liver Cell Responses to Inflammatory Stimuli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.