IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geometric De-noising of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksii Kuchaiev
  • Marija Rašajski
  • Desmond J Higham
  • Nataša Pržulj

Abstract

Understanding complex networks of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is one of the foremost challenges of the post-genomic era. Due to the recent advances in experimental bio-technology, including yeast-2-hybrid (Y2H), tandem affinity purification (TAP) and other high-throughput methods for protein-protein interaction (PPI) detection, huge amounts of PPI network data are becoming available. Of major concern, however, are the levels of noise and incompleteness. For example, for Y2H screens, it is thought that the false positive rate could be as high as 64%, and the false negative rate may range from 43% to 71%. TAP experiments are believed to have comparable levels of noise.We present a novel technique to assess the confidence levels of interactions in PPI networks obtained from experimental studies. We use it for predicting new interactions and thus for guiding future biological experiments. This technique is the first to utilize currently the best fitting network model for PPI networks, geometric graphs. Our approach achieves specificity of 85% and sensitivity of 90%. We use it to assign confidence scores to physical protein-protein interactions in the human PPI network downloaded from BioGRID. Using our approach, we predict 251 interactions in the human PPI network, a statistically significant fraction of which correspond to protein pairs sharing common GO terms. Moreover, we validate a statistically significant portion of our predicted interactions in the HPRD database and the newer release of BioGRID. The data and Matlab code implementing the methods are freely available from the web site: http://www.kuchaev.com/Denoising.Author Summary: Proteins are responsible for much of the biological ‘heavy lifting’ that keeps our cells functioning. However, proteins don't usually work alone; instead they typically bind together to form geometrically and chemically complex structures that are tailored for a specific task. Experimental techniques allow us to detect whether two types of proteins are capable of binding together, or ‘interacting’. This creates a network where two proteins are connected if they have been seen to interact, just as we could regard two people as being connected if they are linked on Facebook. Such protein-protein interaction networks have been developed for several organisms, using a range of methods, all of which are subject to experimental errors. These network data reveal a fascinating and intricate pattern of connections. In particular, it is known that proteins can be arranged into a low-dimensional space, such as a three-dimensional cube, so that interacting proteins are close together. Our work shows that this structure can be exploited to assign confidence levels to recorded protein-protein interactions and predict new interactions that were overlooked experimentally. In tests, we predicted 251 new human protein-protein interactions, and through literature curation we independently validated a statistically significant number of them.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksii Kuchaiev & Marija Rašajski & Desmond J Higham & Nataša Pržulj, 2009. "Geometric De-noising of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(8), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000454
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000454&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silpa Suthram & Taylor Sittler & Trey Ideker, 2005. "The Plasmodium protein network diverges from those of other eukaryotes," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7064), pages 108-112, November.
    2. Anuj Kumar & Michael Snyder, 2002. "Protein complexes take the bait," Nature, Nature, vol. 415(6868), pages 123-124, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yi Fang & William Benjamin & Mengtian Sun & Karthik Ramani, 2011. "Global Geometric Affinity for Revealing High Fidelity Protein Interaction Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-10, May.
    2. Kumar, Ajay & Singh, Shashank Sheshar & Singh, Kuldeep & Biswas, Bhaskar, 2020. "Link prediction techniques, applications, and performance: A survey," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 553(C).
    3. Saket Navlakha & Anthony Gitter & Ziv Bar-Joseph, 2012. "A Network-based Approach for Predicting Missing Pathway Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B J Morrison McKay & Clare Sansom, 2009. "Webb Miller and Trey Ideker To Receive Top International Bioinformatics Awards for 2009 from the International Society for Computational Biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-4, April.
    2. Saeid Rasti & Chrysafis Vogiatzis, 2019. "A survey of computational methods in protein–protein interaction networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 276(1), pages 35-87, May.
    3. Bao, Zhong-Kui & Ma, Chuang & Xiang, Bing-Bing & Zhang, Hai-Feng, 2017. "Identification of influential nodes in complex networks: Method from spreading probability viewpoint," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 391-397.
    4. Juan A G Ranea & Ian Morilla & Jon G Lees & Adam J Reid & Corin Yeats & Andrew B Clegg & Francisca Sanchez-Jimenez & Christine Orengo, 2010. "Finding the “Dark Matter” in Human and Yeast Protein Network Prediction and Modelling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Ma, Ling-ling & Ma, Chuang & Zhang, Hai-Feng & Wang, Bing-Hong, 2016. "Identifying influential spreaders in complex networks based on gravity formula," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 451(C), pages 205-212.
    6. Kuo-Ching Ying & Shih-Wei Lin, 2020. "Maximizing cohesion and separation for detecting protein functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.