IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0020052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iterative Reconstruction of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks: An Algorithmic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Christian L Barrett
  • Bernhard O Palsson

Abstract

The number of complete, publicly available genome sequences is now greater than 200, and this number is expected to rapidly grow in the near future as metagenomic and environmental sequencing efforts escalate and the cost of sequencing drops. In order to make use of this data for understanding particular organisms and for discerning general principles about how organisms function, it will be necessary to reconstruct their various biochemical reaction networks. Principal among these will be transcriptional regulatory networks. Given the physical and logical complexity of these networks, the various sources of (often noisy) data that can be utilized for their elucidation, the monetary costs involved, and the huge number of potential experiments (~1012) that can be performed, experiment design algorithms will be necessary for synthesizing the various computational and experimental data to maximize the efficiency of regulatory network reconstruction. This paper presents an algorithm for experimental design to systematically and efficiently reconstruct transcriptional regulatory networks. It is meant to be applied iteratively in conjunction with an experimental laboratory component. The algorithm is presented here in the context of reconstructing transcriptional regulation for metabolism in Escherichia coli, and, through a retrospective analysis with previously performed experiments, we show that the produced experiment designs conform to how a human would design experiments. The algorithm is able to utilize probability estimates based on a wide range of computational and experimental sources to suggest experiments with the highest potential of discovering the greatest amount of new regulatory knowledge.Synopsis: In recent years, the exploration of life has been bolstered through the advent of whole genome sequencing. This new data source significantly enables the reconstruction of genome-scale metabolic networks. After a metabolic reconstruction, it will be necessary to discover the genetic control mechanisms that operate within an organism. Transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) reconstruction is costly both in terms of time and money, so it is critical that the reconstruction efforts be made as efficient as possible. Experiments must be designed so that the most new regulatory knowledge is discovered in each experiment. The huge number of possible experiments (~1012) and the vast amount of heterogeneous data available for designing experiments overwhelms the human ability to assimilate. The authors have developed an algorithm that utilizes a mathematical model of a reconstructed metabolic network integrated with a partially reconstructed TRN to identify the experiment designs with the highest potential of yielding the most new regulatory knowledge. The authors show that the produced experiment designs are similar to those a human expert would produce, and that the algorithm has a facility to incorporate any relevant data source to design such experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian L Barrett & Bernhard O Palsson, 2006. "Iterative Reconstruction of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks: An Algorithmic Approach," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020052
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020052&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus W. Covert & Eric M. Knight & Jennifer L. Reed & Markus J. Herrgard & Bernhard O. Palsson, 2004. "Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 429(6987), pages 92-96, May.
    2. Hiroaki Kitano, 2002. "Computational systems biology," Nature, Nature, vol. 420(6912), pages 206-210, November.
    3. Manolis Kellis & Nick Patterson & Matthew Endrizzi & Bruce Birren & Eric S. Lander, 2003. "Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 241-254, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Das Mouli & Murthy Chivukula A. & De Rajat K., 2014. "Second order optimization for the inference of gene regulatory pathways," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 19-33, February.
    2. Diego Calzolari & Giovanni Paternostro & Patrick L Harrington Jr. & Carlo Piermarocchi & Phillip M Duxbury, 2007. "Selective Control of the Apoptosis Signaling Network in Heterogeneous Cell Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Bandara & Johannes P Schlöder & Roland Eils & Hans Georg Bock & Tobias Meyer, 2009. "Optimal Experimental Design for Parameter Estimation of a Cell Signaling Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Tao Song & Hong Gu, 2014. "Discriminative Motif Discovery via Simulated Evolution and Random Under-Sampling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Mark Read & Paul S. Andrews & Jon Timmis & Vipin Kumar, 2011. "Techniques for grounding agent-based simulations in the real domain: a case study in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 67-86, May.
    4. Pan-Jun Kim & Nathan D Price, 2011. "Genetic Co-Occurrence Network across Sequenced Microbes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Chandra, Yanto & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2017. "Firm internationalization from a network-centric complex-systems perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 691-701.
    6. Jacobo Ayensa-Jiménez & Marina Pérez-Aliacar & Teodora Randelovic & José Antonio Sanz-Herrera & Mohamed H. Doweidar & Manuel Doblaré, 2020. "Analysis of the Parametric Correlation in Mathematical Modeling of In Vitro Glioblastoma Evolution Using Copulas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Qing-Ju Jiao & Yan-Kai Zhang & Lu-Ning Li & Hong-Bin Shen, 2011. "BinTree Seeking: A Novel Approach to Mine Both Bi-Sparse and Cohesive Modules in Protein Interaction Networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Tom C Freeman & Leon Goldovsky & Markus Brosch & Stijn van Dongen & Pierre Mazière & Russell J Grocock & Shiri Freilich & Janet Thornton & Anton J Enright, 2007. "Construction, Visualisation, and Clustering of Transcription Networks from Microarray Expression Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-11, October.
    9. Yuksel Bayraktar & Esme Isik & Ibrahim Isik & Ayfer Ozyilmaz & Metin Toprak & Fatma Kahraman Guloglu & Serdar Aydin, 2022. "Analyzing of Alzheimer’s Disease Based on Biomedical and Socio-Economic Approach Using Molecular Communication, Artificial Neural Network, and Random Forest Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Alexander Kawrykow & Gary Roumanis & Alfred Kam & Daniel Kwak & Clarence Leung & Chu Wu & Eleyine Zarour & Phylo players & Luis Sarmenta & Mathieu Blanchette & Jérôme Waldispühl, 2012. "Phylo: A Citizen Science Approach for Improving Multiple Sequence Alignment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, March.
    11. Alessandro L. V. Coradini & Christopher Ne Ville & Zachary A. Krieger & Joshua Roemer & Cara Hull & Shawn Yang & Daniel T. Lusk & Ian M. Ehrenreich, 2023. "Building synthetic chromosomes from natural DNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Mika Gustafsson & Michael Hörnquist, 2010. "Gene Expression Prediction by Soft Integration and the Elastic Net—Best Performance of the DREAM3 Gene Expression Challenge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-8, February.
    13. Diego Fernández Slezak & Cecilia Suárez & Guillermo A Cecchi & Guillermo Marshall & Gustavo Stolovitzky, 2010. "When the Optimal Is Not the Best: Parameter Estimation in Complex Biological Models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-10, October.
    14. Matthew A Hibbs & Chad L Myers & Curtis Huttenhower & David C Hess & Kai Li & Amy A Caudy & Olga G Troyanskaya, 2009. "Directing Experimental Biology: A Case Study in Mitochondrial Biogenesis," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, March.
    15. Alan A Cohen & Emmanuel Milot & Qing Li & Patrick Bergeron & Roxane Poirier & Francis Dusseault-Bélanger & Tamàs Fülöp & Maxime Leroux & Véronique Legault & E Jeffrey Metter & Linda P Fried & Luigi Fe, 2015. "Detection of a Novel, Integrative Aging Process Suggests Complex Physiological Integration," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Valerie Storms & Marleen Claeys & Aminael Sanchez & Bart De Moor & Annemieke Verstuyf & Kathleen Marchal, 2010. "The Effect of Orthology and Coregulation on Detecting Regulatory Motifs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-11, February.
    17. Robert K Bradley & Adam Roberts & Michael Smoot & Sudeep Juvekar & Jaeyoung Do & Colin Dewey & Ian Holmes & Lior Pachter, 2009. "Fast Statistical Alignment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Rahul Siddharthan & Eric D Siggia & Erik van Nimwegen, 2005. "PhyloGibbs: A Gibbs Sampling Motif Finder That Incorporates Phylogeny," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(7), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Harri Lähdesmäki & Alistair G Rust & Ilya Shmulevich, 2008. "Probabilistic Inference of Transcription Factor Binding from Multiple Data Sources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, March.
    20. Niki Vermeulen, 2018. "The choreography of a new research field: Aggregation, circulation and oscillation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(8), pages 1764-1784, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0020052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.