IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3004025.html

Moral and perceptual conflict processing are implemented by distinct brain activation and functional connectivity patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Ruida Zhu
  • Marcus Grueschow
  • Marius Moisa
  • Chao Liu
  • Christian C Ruff

Abstract

While humans resemble other primates in terms of motor and perceptual abilities, our behavior is uniquely characterized by morality—the ability to choose our actions based on specific ethical values. The evolutionary origins and neurobiological basis of moral behavior are debated intensely, with opposing proposals about whether moral decisions rely on domain-general decision-making neural circuitry (neural common currency hypothesis) or on unique neural processes that were shaped by evolutionary pressures associated with life in groups (social brain hypothesis). Here we examine the potential overlap between moral and perceptual decision-making, by combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with computational modeling of behavior in a novel task requiring human participants to make alternating moral and perceptual choices on identical stimuli. At the algorithmic level, we found that moral and perceptual choices were well fit by the same sequential sampling model, which allowed us to quantify and directly compare conflicts between the choice alternatives for both types of decision-making. At the implementational level, moral and perceptual choice conflicts were represented by distinct neural activity patterns; in fact, neural signals in some brain areas (e.g., temporoparietal junction) encoded the strength of the two types of conflict in opposite directions. Our findings suggest that while similar computational decision mechanisms underlie both moral and perceptual choices, their neural implementation is fundamentally different, supporting the social brain hypothesis.Moral decisions may share computational mechanisms with perceptual decisions, but whether they rely on common or distinct neural systems remains debated. This study shows that moral and perceptual choices follow similar evidence-accumulation computations, yet engage fundamentally different neural representations, particularly in social brain regions such as the temporoparietal junction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruida Zhu & Marcus Grueschow & Marius Moisa & Chao Liu & Christian C Ruff, 2026. "Moral and perceptual conflict processing are implemented by distinct brain activation and functional connectivity patterns," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(10), pages 1-38, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3004025
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3004025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3004025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3004025&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3004025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3004025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.