Author
Listed:
- Nikolaos Smit
- Berta Roura-Torres
- Axelle Delaunay
- Alice Baniel
- Elise Huchard
- Marie J E Charpentier
Abstract
Female fitness depends on reproductive pace and offspring survival, both of which are determined by the ability to balance resource allocation between current and future reproduction. Using 11 years of data on 356 pregnancies (52 of which resulted in fetal loss) from 117 wild female mandrills, we show that females who conceive while still caring for a young infant experience a greater probability of fetal loss as well as increased mother-infant behavioral conflict in the form of maternal rejection. In addition, females whose infants throw more tantrums show a greater probability of fetal loss, consistent with observations from other species where living offspring can interfere in parental reproduction. Finally, females who lose a fetus show greater subsequent reproductive success (produce more surviving infants and show shorter inter-birth intervals) than females who give birth but their infants die soon after birth. These findings suggest that fetal loss may represent an adaptive physiological response to the energetic constraints imposed by overlapping gestation and maternal care, potentially limiting the fitness costs associated with short inter-birth intervals and concurrent investment in multiple dependent offspring.Maternal fitness depends on balancing investment between current and future reproduction. This study shows that, in wild mandrills, infant presence and tantrum behavior predict fetal loss, consistent with an adaptive response that reduces the costs of concurrent reproductive investment.
Suggested Citation
Nikolaos Smit & Berta Roura-Torres & Axelle Delaunay & Alice Baniel & Elise Huchard & Marie J E Charpentier, 2026.
"Infant presence and mother-infant conflict predict fetal loss in wild mandrills,"
PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(11), pages 1-14, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003970
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003970
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.