IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3003956.html

Inhibitory tone in the dentate gyrus dynamically prioritizes memory flexibility or stability by tuning a sensitivity-consistency continuum

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Pérez-Montoyo
  • José María Caramés
  • Raquel Garcia-Hernandez
  • Mónica Peralta-Cañadas
  • Santiago Canals
  • Encarni Marcos

Abstract

A fundamental challenge for memory systems is balancing two opposing demands: sensitivity, which enables the encoding of subtle differences between similar experiences, and consistency, which preserves stable representations against interference. How the brain resolves this trade-off has remained unclear. Here, we identify inhibition in the dentate gyrus (DG) as a regulator of this balance, shifting hippocampal computation between sensitivity- and consistency-dominated regimes. Using an integrative approach that combines cell-type–specific pharmacogenetics in mice, behavioral assays, and computational modeling, we demonstrate that reducing inhibition during the encoding of overlapping experiences enhances later discrimination during recall. Computational modeling further predicted that, besides discrimination enhancement, disinhibition also increases susceptibility to interference, an effect that becomes particularly critical under high memory load, and compromises memory consistency across experiences. Conversely, increased inhibition stabilized memory representations, but reduced sensitivity, rendering similar experiences indistinguishable. These specific predictions were confirmed experimentally, showing that the DG inhibition tunes a sensitivity-consistency continuum. Together, our results uncover a systems-level principle by which hippocampal circuits dynamically prioritize flexibility or stability in memory formation depending on inhibitory tone. This framework advances our understanding of how the brain balances competing computational demands and has implications for neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders in which excitation–inhibition balance is disrupted.A fundamental challenge for memory systems is balancing sensitivity to similar experiences against the need for stable, interference-resistant representations. This study shows that dentate gyrus inhibition regulates this trade-off, with reduced inhibition enhancing discrimination but increasing interference, while increased inhibition stabilizes memories at the cost of sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Pérez-Montoyo & José María Caramés & Raquel Garcia-Hernandez & Mónica Peralta-Cañadas & Santiago Canals & Encarni Marcos, 2026. "Inhibitory tone in the dentate gyrus dynamically prioritizes memory flexibility or stability by tuning a sensitivity-consistency continuum," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003956
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003956
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003956&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.