IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3003889.html

Social learning dynamically shapes moral decision-making by biasing subjective valuation

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Benistant
  • Valentin Guigon
  • Alain Nicolas
  • Edmund Derrington
  • Jean-Claude Dreher

Abstract

Observing immoral behavior increases one’s dishonesty by social influence and learning processes. The neurocomputational mechanisms underlying such moral contagion remain unclear. We tested different mechanistic hypotheses to account for moral contagion. We used model-based fMRI and a new cheating game in which participants were sequentially placed in honest and dishonest social norm contexts. Participants’ cheating behavior increased in the dishonest norm context but was unchanged in the honest one. The best model to account for behavior indicated that participants’ valuation was dynamically biased by learning that others had cheated. At the group level, this valuation bias was not encoded by any specific brain region. Instead, this neural signal depended on individual differences in conformity, and engaged the bilateral lateral prefrontal cortex. During learning, simulation of others’ cheating behavior was encoded in the posterior superior temporal sulcus. Together, these findings provide a mechanistic understanding of how learning about others’ dishonesty biases individuals’ valuation of cheating but does not alter one’s established preferences.Observing others’ immoral behavior can increase one’s own dishonesty, but the neurocomputational mechanisms driving this moral contagion remain unclear. This study shows that cheating increases in dishonest contexts via learned valuation biases involving lateral prefrontal cortex and posterior superior temporal sulcus encoding others’ cheating behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Benistant & Valentin Guigon & Alain Nicolas & Edmund Derrington & Jean-Claude Dreher, 2026. "Social learning dynamically shapes moral decision-making by biasing subjective valuation," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(7), pages 1-1, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003889
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003889
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003889&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003889?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.