Author
Listed:
- Daniela Valério
- Samuel Debray
- Alireza Karami
- Maxime Cauté
- Nicolás Gravel
- Stanislas Dehaene
Abstract
How does the human brain represent the meaning of abstract symbols? Some theories postulate the existence of semantic spaces where concepts occupy positions that reflect their conceptual relationships. In the number domain, psychological evidence suggests that integers are represented along a mental number line which, with education, integrates higher-level number concepts such as fractions. To test this hypothesis, we recorded whole-brain 7T fMRI responses to integer and fraction symbols during an active magnitude comparison task designed to engage magnitude processing. Consistent with predictions, we found both behavioral and neural numerical distance effects. Activation vectors in intraparietal, inferior temporal, prefrontal, hippocampal, and parahippocampal cortices formed a two-dimensional semantic space organized by numerical magnitude and domain (fractions versus integers). Gaussian fits revealed a topographic map of numerical preferences in the anterior inferior parietal cortex, common to both domains. Our results suggest that, when educated adults engage in an explicit magnitude comparison task, their brain can construct an ordered representation that integrates fractions and integers, with a topographic organization in the anterior IPS/IPL.How does the brain represent symbolic integers and fractions? This study shows that educated adults process both integers and fractions within a shared, topographic map in the parietal cortex, indicating that the brain integrates integers and higher-level concepts such as fractions to support the understanding and comparison of numerical magnitudes.
Suggested Citation
Daniela Valério & Samuel Debray & Alireza Karami & Maxime Cauté & Nicolás Gravel & Stanislas Dehaene, 2026.
"A cortical semantic map integrates fractions and integers in the human brain,"
PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(10), pages 1-29, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003820
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003820
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003820. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.