IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3003694.html

Self-allocation bias in performance-based cooperative decisions is driven by self-interest rather than distorted performance encoding

Author

Listed:
  • Sihui Zhang
  • Xue Yong
  • Yina Ma
  • Christoph W Korn

Abstract

Human cooperation often involves performing joint tasks, where success relies on how collective rewards are allocated among cooperating parties based on their individual performance and contribution to task outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether and how individual performance and contribution give rise to self-related biases in such allocation decisions. Here, we developed a novel performance-based social allocation task that manipulated how individual performance contributed to joint outcomes. Across two experiments, participants exhibited a robust self-allocation bias: they allocated more rewards to themselves and disproportionately disregarded their own performance, particularly when their performance did not causally contribute to the joint outcome. This self-allocation bias was amplified in individuals with stronger individualistic social preferences, as measured by social value orientation. At the neural level, self-relevant (versus self-irrelevant) allocation decisions were associated with increased activity in the medial prefrontal cortex extending into the anterior cingulate cortex, insula, and temporoparietal junction (TPJ). Moreover, the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, lateral orbitofrontal cortex, and TPJ tracked trial-by-trial variations in relative performance as a function of contribution structure, independent of self-relevance. Together, these findings suggest that self-allocation bias in performance-based decisions is unlikely to arise from distorted neural encodings of performance. Instead, self-interest may shape how contribution-structured performance information is used in social-allocation choices, providing a more precise account of how self-serving behavior emerges in cooperative contexts.Human cooperation requires allocating joint rewards based on individual performance, but it is unclear how these factors produce self‑serving biases. This study shows that people reliably over‑allocate rewards to themselves, driven by self‑interest rather than distorted performance encoding, with prefrontal and temporoparietal regions tracking performance and self‑relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sihui Zhang & Xue Yong & Yina Ma & Christoph W Korn, 2026. "Self-allocation bias in performance-based cooperative decisions is driven by self-interest rather than distorted performance encoding," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(3), pages 1-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003694
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003694
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003694&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.