IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3003667.html

Categorical identity signatures can reduce host error rates during brood parasitism

Author

Listed:
  • Tanmay Dixit
  • Ming Liu
  • Jana M Riederer
  • Jonah M Walker
  • Cameron J Blair
  • Jess Lund
  • Collins Moya
  • Claire N Spottiswoode

Abstract

Biological recognition is often modeled as involving discrimination of continuously-distributed (and continuously-perceived) traits according to decision thresholds. However, traits such as animal signals can be categorically distributed. Here, we test how such categorical distributions may influence fundamental trade-offs in signal recognition, using a brood parasite–host system involving identity recognition. The African cuckoo finch Anomalospiza imberbis parasitizes several host species, each of which has evolved inter-individual variation in egg appearance (“egg signatures”) that facilitates recognition and rejection of mimetic cuckoo finch eggs. We demonstrate that egg signature traits in one host species, the zitting cisticola Cisticola juncidis, are categorically distributed. Field experiments reveal that zitting cisticolas make fewer Type II errors (accepting parasitic eggs) and Type I errors (rejecting their own eggs) than hosts exhibiting continuous variation. This challenges the long-standing expectation from classification models, statistics, and signal detection theory that there must be a strict trade-off between these two error types. Individual-based simulations clarify mechanisms by which categorical variation can generate low error rates, especially when combined with “category-based rejection,” whereby hosts only reject eggs of different categories to their own. Our findings show that the categorical distribution and category-based perception of trait variation can shape error trade-offs and coevolutionary dynamics, which should inform studies on other mimicry or self/non-self recognition systems, including immune recognition. They also highlight the importance of quantifying trait distributions and how they are perceived, when understanding coevolution between deceivers and those they deceive.In brood parasitism, prior work predicts a trade-off in the host's error rates from accepting foreign eggs and rejecting their own eggs. This study combines comparative field experiments and simulations to show advantages when egg trait distributions are categorical, rather than continuous, with implications for other types of co-evolutionary arms races.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanmay Dixit & Ming Liu & Jana M Riederer & Jonah M Walker & Cameron J Blair & Jess Lund & Collins Moya & Claire N Spottiswoode, 2026. "Categorical identity signatures can reduce host error rates during brood parasitism," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 24(2), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003667
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003667
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003667&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.