Author
Listed:
- Paul B Conway
- Livia Autore
- Andrea Muñoz Zamora
- Antoine Harel
- Zijun Wang
- Armn A Tavallaei
- Stephen M Winston
- Clara Ortega-de San Luis
- James D O’Leary
- Mark A Brimble
- Gisella Vetere
- Tomás J Ryan
Abstract
Animals rely on innate and learned behavior to respond to their environment, but how the brain balances hardwired responses with adaptive flexibility remains unclear. Here, we demonstrate that innate looming stimulus responses in Mus musculus can be attenuated via repeated unreinforced presentation. This attenuation is long-lasting and generalizing, but is rapidly recovered when the stimulus is paired with an electric foot-shock. Fiber photometry recordings reveal attenuation of responses to visual looming stimuli in the SC and PAG, which do not recover following recovery of behavioral responses. Analysis of c-Fos expression uncovered a ventral CA1 (vCA1) ensemble that is active during both innate and learned looming fear responses. We report that this vCA1 engram is not necessary for innate defensive behavior but is necessary for learned fear responses. These findings reveal a novel role of the hippocampus in adapting to looming stimuli, and provide a platform for understanding the interaction of memory and instinct.How does the brain balance innate responses with adaptive learning when reacting to threats? This study shows that repeated exposure to looming stimuli reduces innate defensive responses via hippocampal modulation, revealing a ventral CA1 engram essential for learned—but not innate—fear, and highlighting the hippocampus’ role in instinct adaptation.
Suggested Citation
Paul B Conway & Livia Autore & Andrea Muñoz Zamora & Antoine Harel & Zijun Wang & Armn A Tavallaei & Stephen M Winston & Clara Ortega-de San Luis & James D O’Leary & Mark A Brimble & Gisella Vetere & , 2025.
"Extinction and subsequent updating of innate fear responses to a visual looming stimulus rely on hippocampus-dependent mechanisms,"
PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(9), pages 1-19, September.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003391
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003391
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.