IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3003149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Removing facial features from structural MRI images biases visual quality assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Céline Provins
  • Élodie Savary
  • Thomas Sanchez
  • Emeline Mullier
  • Jaime Barranco
  • Elda Fischi-Gómez
  • Yasser Alemán-Gómez
  • Jonas Richiardi
  • Russell A Poldrack
  • Patric Hagmann
  • Oscar Esteban

Abstract

A critical step before data-sharing of human neuroimaging is removing facial features to protect individuals’ privacy. However, not only does this process redact identifiable information about individuals, but it also removes non-identifiable information. This introduces undesired variability into downstream analysis and interpretation. This registered report investigated the degree to which the so-called defacing altered the quality assessment of T1-weighted images of the human brain from the openly available “IXI dataset”. The effect of defacing on manual quality assessment was investigated on a single-site subset of the dataset (N = 185). By comparing two linear mixed-effects models, we determined that four trained human raters’ perception of quality was significantly influenced by defacing by modeling their ratings on the same set of images in two conditions: “nondefaced” (i.e., preserving facial features) and “defaced”. In addition, we investigated these biases on automated quality assessments by applying repeated-measures, multivariate ANOVA (rm-MANOVA) on the image quality metrics extracted with MRIQC on the full IXI dataset (N = 581; three acquisition sites). This study found that defacing altered the quality assessments by humans and showed that MRIQC’s quality metrics were mostly insensitive to defacing.To protect an individual's privacy, facial features are removed before data-sharing of human neuroimaging data. This study shows that this procedure affects the quality ratings given by human raters but not automated image quality metrics, highlighting the importance of using non-defaced images for quality control measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Céline Provins & Élodie Savary & Thomas Sanchez & Emeline Mullier & Jaime Barranco & Elda Fischi-Gómez & Yasser Alemán-Gómez & Jonas Richiardi & Russell A Poldrack & Patric Hagmann & Oscar Esteban, 2025. "Removing facial features from structural MRI images biases visual quality assessment," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(4), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003149
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003149&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.