IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3003127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On improving the sustainability of peer review

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Routledge
  • Nonia Pariente
  • On Behalf of the PLOS Biology Staff Editors

Abstract

The term “reviewer fatigue” has become only too familiar in scientific publishing. How can we ease the burden on reviewers to make the peer review system more sustainable, while streamlining the publication process for authors?The term “reviewer fatigue” has become only too familiar in scientific publishing. This editorial discusses how we can ease the burden on reviewers to make the peer review system more sustainable, while streamlining the publication process for authors.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Routledge & Nonia Pariente & On Behalf of the PLOS Biology Staff Editors, 2025. "On improving the sustainability of peer review," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 23(3), pages 1-3, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003127
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003127
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003127&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003127?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3003127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.