IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3002612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the evolution of research topics in a biological field using plant science as an example

Author

Listed:
  • Shin-Han Shiu
  • Melissa D Lehti-Shiu

Abstract

Scientific advances due to conceptual or technological innovations can be revealed by examining how research topics have evolved. But such topical evolution is difficult to uncover and quantify because of the large body of literature and the need for expert knowledge in a wide range of areas in a field. Using plant biology as an example, we used machine learning and language models to classify plant science citations into topics representing interconnected, evolving subfields. The changes in prevalence of topical records over the last 50 years reflect shifts in major research trends and recent radiation of new topics, as well as turnover of model species and vastly different plant science research trajectories among countries. Our approaches readily summarize the topical diversity and evolution of a scientific field with hundreds of thousands of relevant papers, and they can be applied broadly to other fields.Our ability to understand the progress of science through the evolution of research topics is limited by the need for specialist knowledge and the exponential growth of the literature. This study uses artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches to demonstrate how a biological field (plant science) has evolved, how the model systems have changed, and how countries differ in terms of research focus and impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Shin-Han Shiu & Melissa D Lehti-Shiu, 2024. "Assessing the evolution of research topics in a biological field using plant science as an example," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 22(5), pages 1-27, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3002612
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3002612
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3002612&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3002612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.