IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001921.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity

Author

Listed:
  • Jasmine R Lee
  • Aleks Terauds
  • Josie Carwardine
  • Justine D Shaw
  • Richard A Fuller
  • Hugh P Possingham
  • Steven L Chown
  • Peter Convey
  • Neil Gilbert
  • Kevin A Hughes
  • Ewan McIvor
  • Sharon A Robinson
  • Yan Ropert-Coudert
  • Dana M Bergstrom
  • Elisabeth M Biersma
  • Claire Christian
  • Don A Cowan
  • Yves Frenot
  • Stéphanie Jenouvrier
  • Lisa Kelley
  • Michael J Lee
  • Heather J Lynch
  • Birgit Njåstad
  • Antonio Quesada
  • Ricardo M Roura
  • E Ashley Shaw
  • Damon Stanwell-Smith
  • Megumu Tsujimoto
  • Diana H Wall
  • Annick Wilmotte
  • Iadine Chadès

Abstract

Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity faces multiple threats, from invasive species to climate change. Yet no large-scale assessments of threat management strategies exist. Applying a structured participatory approach, we demonstrate that existing conservation efforts are insufficient in a changing world, estimating that 65% (at best 37%, at worst 97%) of native terrestrial taxa and land-associated seabirds are likely to decline by 2100 under current trajectories. Emperor penguins are identified as the most vulnerable taxon, followed by other seabirds and dry soil nematodes. We find that implementing 10 key threat management strategies in parallel, at an estimated present-day equivalent annual cost of US$23 million, could benefit up to 84% of Antarctic taxa. Climate change is identified as the most pervasive threat to Antarctic biodiversity and influencing global policy to effectively limit climate change is the most beneficial conservation strategy. However, minimising impacts of human activities and improved planning and management of new infrastructure projects are cost-effective and will help to minimise regional threats. Simultaneous global and regional efforts are critical to secure Antarctic biodiversity for future generations.Antarctic terrestrial biodiversity is at risk. This study demonstrates that existing conservation efforts will be insufficient in a changing world and that simultaneous global and regional efforts are urgently required to conserve Antarctic biodiversity for future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Jasmine R Lee & Aleks Terauds & Josie Carwardine & Justine D Shaw & Richard A Fuller & Hugh P Possingham & Steven L Chown & Peter Convey & Neil Gilbert & Kevin A Hughes & Ewan McIvor & Sharon A Robins, 2022. "Threat management priorities for conserving Antarctic biodiversity," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-31, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001921
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001921?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel I. Leihy & Bernard W. T. Coetzee & Fraser Morgan & Ben Raymond & Justine D. Shaw & Aleks Terauds & Kees Bastmeijer & Steven L. Chown, 2020. "Antarctica’s wilderness fails to capture continent’s biodiversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 583(7817), pages 567-571, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pertierra, L.R. & Santos-Martin, F. & Hughes, K.A. & Avila, C. & Caceres, J.O. & De Filippo, D. & Gonzalez, S. & Grant, S.M. & Lynch, H. & Marina-Montes, C. & Quesada, A. & Tejedo, P. & Tin, T. & Bena, 2021. "Ecosystem services in Antarctica: Global assessment of the current state, future challenges and managing opportunities," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001921. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.