IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sexual selection in females and the evolution of polyandry

Author

Listed:
  • Salomé Fromonteil
  • Lucas Marie-Orleach
  • Lennart Winkler
  • Tim Janicke

Abstract

Over the last decades, the field of sexual selection underwent a paradigm shift from sexual-stereotype thinking of “eager” males and “coy” females towards a more nuanced perspective acknowledging that not only males but also females can benefit from multiple mating and compete for mating partners. Yet, sexual selection in females is still considered a peculiarity, and the evolution of polyandry is often viewed to result from a higher mating interest of males. Here, we present meta-analytic evidence from 77 species across a broad range of animal taxa to demonstrate that female reproductive success is overall positively correlated with mating success, suggesting that females typically benefit from multiple mating. Importantly, we found that these fitness gains likely promote the evolution of polyandry. Our findings offer support for the idea that sexual selection is widespread in females and to play a key role for the evolution of animal mating systems. Thereby, our results extend our understanding of the evolutionary consequences of sexual reproduction and contribute to a more balanced view of how sexual selection operates in males and females.

Suggested Citation

  • Salomé Fromonteil & Lucas Marie-Orleach & Lennart Winkler & Tim Janicke, 2023. "Sexual selection in females and the evolution of polyandry," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(1), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001916
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001916
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001916&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly A. Rosvall, 2011. "Intrasexual competition in females: evidence for sexual selection?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1131-1140.
    2. N.M. Gerlach & J.W McGlothlin & P.G Parker & E.D Ketterson, 2012. "Reinterpreting Bateman gradients: multiple mating and selection in both sexes of a songbird species," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(5), pages 1078-1088.
    3. Malin Ah-King, 2011. "Female sexual selection in light of the Darwin--Bateman paradigm," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(6), pages 1142-1143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gine Roll Skjærvø & Eivin Røskaft, 2015. "Wealth and the opportunity for sexual selection in men and women," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 444-451.
    2. Zitan Song & Yao Liu & Isobel Booksmythe & Changqing Ding, 2017. "Effects of individual-based preferences for colour-banded mates on sex allocation in zebra finches," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1228-1235.
    3. Rômulo Carleial & Tommaso Pizzari & David S. Richardson & Grant C. McDonald, 2023. "Disentangling the causes of temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Ivette A Chamorro-Florescano & Mario E Favila & Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez, 2017. "Contests over reproductive resources in female roller beetles: Outcome predictors and sharing as an option," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Vicente García-Navas & Esperanza S. Ferrer & Javier Bueno-Enciso & Rafael Barrientos & Juan José Sanz & Joaquín Ortego, 2014. "Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(1), pages 228-238.
    6. Ana M. Beltrán-Morillas & Laura Villanueva-Moya & M. Dolores Sánchez-Hernández & María Alonso-Ferres & Marta Garrido-Macías & Francisca Expósito, 2023. "Infidelity in the Adolescence Stage: The Roles of Negative Affect, Hostility, and Psychological Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Karan J Odom & David M Logue & Colin E Studds & Michelle K Monroe & Susanna K Campbell & Kevin E Omland, 2017. "Duetting behavior varies with sex, season, and singing role in a tropical oriole (Icterus icterus)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1256-1265.
    8. Malin Ah-King, 2022. "The history of sexual selection research provides insights as to why females are still understudied," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    9. Juan G Rubalcaba & Daniel Fuentes & José P Veiga & Vicente Polo, 2017. "Nest decoration as social signals by males and females: greenery and feathers in starling colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1369-1375.
    10. Anna-Maria Borshagovski & Gautier Baudry & Juhani Hopkins & Arja Kaitala, 2019. "Pale by comparison: competitive interactions between signaling female glow-worms," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 20-26.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.