IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Percie du Sert
  • Amrita Ahluwalia
  • Sabina Alam
  • Marc T Avey
  • Monya Baker
  • William J Browne
  • Alejandra Clark
  • Innes C Cuthill
  • Ulrich Dirnagl
  • Michael Emerson
  • Paul Garner
  • Stephen T Holgate
  • David W Howells
  • Viki Hurst
  • Natasha A Karp
  • Stanley E Lazic
  • Katie Lidster
  • Catriona J MacCallum
  • Malcolm Macleod
  • Esther J Pearl
  • Ole H Petersen
  • Frances Rawle
  • Penny Reynolds
  • Kieron Rooney
  • Emily S Sena
  • Shai D Silberberg
  • Thomas Steckler
  • Hanno Würbel

Abstract

Improving the reproducibility of biomedical research is a major challenge. Transparent and accurate reporting is vital to this process; it allows readers to assess the reliability of the findings and repeat or build upon the work of other researchers. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) were developed in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to report in publications describing in vivo experiments. Despite widespread endorsement by the scientific community, the impact of ARRIVE on the transparency of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. We have revised the ARRIVE guidelines to update them and facilitate their use in practice. The revised guidelines are published alongside this paper. This explanation and elaboration document was developed as part of the revision. It provides further information about each of the 21 items in ARRIVE 2.0, including the rationale and supporting evidence for their inclusion in the guidelines, elaboration of details to report, and examples of good reporting from the published literature. This document also covers advice and best practice in the design and conduct of animal studies to support researchers in improving standards from the start of the experimental design process through to publication.The NC3Rs developed the ARRIVE guidelines in 2010 to help authors and journals identify the minimum information necessary to report in publications describing in vivo experiments. This article explains the rationale behind each item in the revised and updated ARRIVE guidelines 2019, clarifying key concepts and providing illustrative examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Percie du Sert & Amrita Ahluwalia & Sabina Alam & Marc T Avey & Monya Baker & William J Browne & Alejandra Clark & Innes C Cuthill & Ulrich Dirnagl & Michael Emerson & Paul Garner & Stephen T, 2020. "Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(7), pages 1-65, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000411
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.