IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3000407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coordinated circadian timing through the integration of local inputs in Arabidopsis thaliana

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Greenwood
  • Mirela Domijan
  • Peter D Gould
  • Anthony J W Hall
  • James C W Locke

Abstract

Individual plant cells have a genetic circuit, the circadian clock, that times key processes to the day-night cycle. These clocks are aligned to the day-night cycle by multiple environmental signals that vary across the plant. How does the plant integrate clock rhythms, both within and between organs, to ensure coordinated timing? To address this question, we examined the clock at the sub-tissue level across Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings under multiple environmental conditions and genetic backgrounds. Our results show that the clock runs at different speeds (periods) in each organ, which causes the clock to peak at different times across the plant in both constant environmental conditions and light-dark (LD) cycles. Closer examination reveals that spatial waves of clock gene expression propagate both within and between organs. Using a combination of modeling and experiment, we reveal that these spatial waves are the result of the period differences between organs and local coupling, rather than long-distance signaling. With further experiments we show that the endogenous period differences, and thus the spatial waves, can be generated by the organ specificity of inputs into the clock. We demonstrate this by modulating periods using light and metabolic signals, as well as with genetic perturbations. Our results reveal that plant clocks can be set locally by organ-specific inputs but coordinated globally via spatial waves of clock gene expression.Computational modeling and experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana reveal a new mechanism for the coordination of circadian timing across an organism, acting through a combination of organ-specific sensitivity to environmental inputs and local cell-cell coupling.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Greenwood & Mirela Domijan & Peter D Gould & Anthony J W Hall & James C W Locke, 2019. "Coordinated circadian timing through the integration of local inputs in Arabidopsis thaliana," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-31, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000407
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3000407&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilka Schultheiß Araújo & Jessica Magdalena Pietsch & Emma Mathilde Keizer & Bettina Greese & Rachappa Balkunde & Christian Fleck & Martin Hülskamp, 2017. "Stochastic gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Motomu Endo & Hanako Shimizu & Maria A. Nohales & Takashi Araki & Steve A. Kay, 2014. "Tissue-specific clocks in Arabidopsis show asymmetric coupling," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7527), pages 419-422, November.
    3. Michael J. Haydon & Olga Mielczarek & Fiona C. Robertson & Katharine E. Hubbard & Alex A. R. Webb, 2013. "Photosynthetic entrainment of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock," Nature, Nature, vol. 502(7473), pages 689-692, October.
    4. Mark R. Doyle & Seth J. Davis & Ruth M. Bastow & Harriet G. McWatters & László Kozma-Bognár & Ferenc Nagy & Andrew J. Millar & Richard M. Amasino, 2002. "The ELF4 gene controls circadian rhythms and flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana," Nature, Nature, vol. 419(6902), pages 74-77, September.
    5. Tomasz Zielinski & Anne M Moore & Eilidh Troup & Karen J Halliday & Andrew J Millar, 2014. "Strengths and Limitations of Period Estimation Methods for Circadian Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Alex A. R. Webb & Motohide Seki & Akiko Satake & Camila Caldana, 2019. "Continuous dynamic adjustment of the plant circadian oscillator," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathias Foo & Declan G Bates & Ozgur E Akman, 2020. "A simplified modelling framework facilitates more complex representations of plant circadian clocks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-34, March.
    2. Onelia Gagliano & Camilla Luni & Yan Li & Silvia Angiolillo & Wei Qin & Francesco Panariello & Davide Cacchiarelli & Joseph S. Takahashi & Nicola Elvassore, 2021. "Synchronization between peripheral circadian clock and feeding-fasting cycles in microfluidic device sustains oscillatory pattern of transcriptome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Nick E Phillips & Cerys Manning & Nancy Papalopulu & Magnus Rattray, 2017. "Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Grzegorczyk Marco & Aderhold Andrej & Husmeier Dirk, 2015. "Inferring bi-directional interactions between circadian clock genes and metabolism with model ensembles," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 143-167, April.
    5. Alan L Hutchison & Mark Maienschein-Cline & Andrew H Chiang & S M Ali Tabei & Herman Gudjonson & Neil Bahroos & Ravi Allada & Aaron R Dinner, 2015. "Improved Statistical Methods Enable Greater Sensitivity in Rhythm Detection for Genome-Wide Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3000407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.