IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/2002404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act

Author

Listed:
  • Sheldon Krimsky

Abstract

After 40 years, the 1976 US Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) was revised under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. Its original goals of protecting the public from hazardous chemicals were hindered by complex and cumbersome administrative burdens, data limitations, vulnerabilities in risk assessments, and recurring corporate lawsuits. As a result, countless chemicals were entered into commercial use without toxicological information. Few chemicals of the many identified as potential public health threats were regulated or banned. This paper explores the factors that have worked against a comprehensive and rational policy for regulating toxic chemicals and discusses whether the TSCA revisions offer greater public protection against existing and new chemicals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sheldon Krimsky, 2017. "The unsteady state and inertia of chemical regulation under the US Toxic Substances Control Act," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2002404
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2002404&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert G. Poston & Ramendra N. Saha, 2019. "Epigenetic Effects of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers on Human Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Arlene Gabriela & Sarah Leong & Philip S. W. Ong & Derek Weinert & Joe Hlubucek & Peter W. Tait, 2022. "Strengthening Australia’s Chemical Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-24, May.
    3. Kristi Pullen Fedinick & Ilch Yiliqi & Yukyan Lam & David Lennett & Veena Singla & Miriam Rotkin-Ellman & Jennifer Sass, 2021. "A Cumulative Framework for Identifying Overburdened Populations under the Toxic Substances Control Act: Formaldehyde Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, June.
    4. David Vogel, 2022. "The Politics of preemption: American federalism and risk regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1160-1173, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2002404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.