IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/teafle/v9y2022i2p211-220id3118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Economic Sanctions a Barrier to Trade in Environmental Goods? The International Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Tran Manh Ha
  • Doan Ngoc Thang

Abstract

The purpose of economic sanctions is to isolate a sanctioned country and harm its economy to force its government to adjust course, policies, and actions. To resist sanctions, a sanctioned country needs to adopt a variety of survivalist and unsustainable policies that undermine the economic challenge of sanctions at the expense of lowering priority to the environmental sector and the production of environmental goods (EGs). Due to the shortage of EGs in the sanctioned nations, we hypothesize that economic sanctions are a potential driver of trade in EGs. To assess the empirical merits of our theoretical claims, we used panel data with 5,297 pairs of 88 countries for the years spanning 1996 to 2019, inclusive. While economic sanctions take various forms, EGs refer to environmental goods and services that are manufactured, consumed, and disposed of without causing unintended environmental impacts. We used the Combined List of Environmental Goods (CLEG) to define the EGs. Our empirical results indicate that imposition of economic sanctions hinders trade in EGs. We also found clear evidence that the effect becomes more pronounced for the use of trade and financial sanctions and when the economic sanction is put on low-income countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Tran Manh Ha & Doan Ngoc Thang, 2022. "Are Economic Sanctions a Barrier to Trade in Environmental Goods? The International Evidence," The Economics and Finance Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(2), pages 211-220.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:teafle:v:9:y:2022:i:2:p:211-220:id:3118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/29/article/view/3118/6911
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/29/article/view/3118/7017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:teafle:v:9:y:2022:i:2:p:211-220:id:3118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/29/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.