IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v9y2021i1p171-184id699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Structural Equation Model to Reveal Factors Affecting Faculty Members in University Colleges in the Use of Moodle

Author

Listed:
  • Omar M Mahasneh
  • Haroon M Tawarah
  • Hussein A Al-lawama

Abstract

The current study aimed at using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to detect the factors affecting the role of faculty members in university colleges for e-learning system (Moodle). The study has used the descriptive approach through the questionnaire tool which consisted in its final form of (33) items distributed on (10) factors. The study sample consisted of (487) faculty members in university colleges. The AMOS program was used to analyze the data using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through the path analysis method and (goodness-of-fit) tests to test the validity of the proposed model. The results of the study identified (6) factors that affect the use of faculty members for the e-learning system (model) in the teaching process viz., the competence of faculty members, the efficiency of the e-learning system, training benefits, the influence of others, and facilities, in addition (3) factors were identified as outputs for the use of the faculty E-learning system namely quality of teaching, faculty satisfaction, and faculty confidence in the e-learning system. The study recommends educational policy makers in the Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and University Administration to adopt these factors identified in this study and implement the effect of these factors on the use of faculty members for the e-learning system (Moodle) in order to achieve learning outcomes for academic programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar M Mahasneh & Haroon M Tawarah & Hussein A Al-lawama, 2021. "Using Structural Equation Model to Reveal Factors Affecting Faculty Members in University Colleges in the Use of Moodle," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(1), pages 171-184.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:171-184:id:699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/699/1011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/699/4134
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:171-184:id:699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.