IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v9y2021i1p128-140id696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Review on Flipped Classroom Model Versus Traditional Lecture Method

Author

Listed:
  • Saira
  • Fouzia Ajmal
  • Muhammad Hafeez

Abstract

Flipped classroom model is now a well-established learning approach which has brought a paradigm shift by blending technology with the traditional method of teaching. The real meaning of Flipped classroom model is that the traditional lecture method is flipped so that learners get the initial learning material at home and class time is used for cooperative learning. The tools used for the flipped classroom model include Learning management system, social media and like. A lot of research studies exist on Flipped classroom model but these studies lack a unified approach over its significance. If one set of studies ranks Flipped classroom model better than the traditional lecture method; the other instruction models consider its success due to its integration with technology. There are also studies that associate Flipped classroom model with student-centered approach especially in university education. This article reviews a few of these studies with the objective to understand this debate about the right method of learning; and to identify which studies acknowledge the significance of Flipped classroom model. A set of 33 articles published from 2012 to 2020 were selected for this study. The statistical results show a mixed reaction about the acceptability and adaptability of the Flipped classroom model in the modern learning environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Saira & Fouzia Ajmal & Muhammad Hafeez, 2021. "Critical Review on Flipped Classroom Model Versus Traditional Lecture Method," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 9(1), pages 128-140.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:128-140:id:696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/696/1007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/696/4130
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:128-140:id:696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.