IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v8y2020i2p365-378id651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Favorite Methods of Teaching and Evaluation among Students in University Colleges

Author

Listed:
  • Omar M.K Al- Mahasneh
  • Mohammad N.M Ayasrah
  • Shima M.S Yahyaa
  • Raed A Al-Kriemeen
  • Ali S Al-Swalha

Abstract

The present study aimed to identify the favorite methods of teaching and evaluation among students in university colleges. The study adopted a descriptive survey design; self-administered copies of the questionnaire were used to generate data from 1638 students at university colleges, selected by a random sample method. Frequency and percentage were used to analyze data. The findings showed 12 methods of teaching preferred by students (flipped learning, blended learning, simultaneous e-learning, asynchronous e-learning, virtual learning, scientific trips, training in the workplace, problem-solving, critical thinking, visitor lecture, learning by project and activities, and discussion) and seven methods of evaluation preferred by students (evaluation by multiple-choice test, true and false test, observation, written test, interview (face to face), evaluation of performance, and evaluation of portfolio). The results also showed that the teaching method preferred by students is the flipped learning method, where it received the highest frequency 1575 (96%); the evaluation method preferred by students is evaluation by multiple-choice, where it received the highest frequency 1623 (99%). The teaching method preferred by males and females is the flipped learning method; the evaluation method favored by males is the true and false test, and the multiple-choice test is the preferred evaluation method for females. According to the results, the researchers recommended that the faculty members of university colleges use the teaching and evaluation methods preferred by students.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar M.K Al- Mahasneh & Mohammad N.M Ayasrah & Shima M.S Yahyaa & Raed A Al-Kriemeen & Ali S Al-Swalha, 2020. "Favorite Methods of Teaching and Evaluation among Students in University Colleges," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 8(2), pages 365-378.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:365-378:id:651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/651/963
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/651/4497
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:365-378:id:651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.