IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v3y2015i1p17-27id482.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review of the School-Based Assessment in Brunei Darussalam

Author

Listed:
  • Haji Mohammad Redzuan Haji Botty
  • Masitah Shahrill

Abstract

School-Based Assessment for Learning (SBAfL) was developed by the Ministry of Education in Brunei Darussalam to assess how well the students have achieved the objectives and learning outcomes as mentioned in the mathematics syllabus. Under the SBAfL, the Brunei Common Assessment Tasks (BCATs) was introduced where teachers develop and adapt standard-based criteria and rubrics to help students assess their developing knowledge and skills. In this study, random samples of the fourth assigned BCAT (BCAT 4) for Year 7 were collected as research artefacts. A semi-structured interview was conducted with Ms. Ella, who assessed the Year 7 students. Learning outcomes and marks awarded in BCAT 4 are discussed in this paper. The Year 7 students were expected to carry out the task based on the learning outcomes, which are categorised into three dimensions: Knowledge and Understanding (K&U), Thinking skills, Problem Solving and Investigation (PSI), and Communication Skills (CS). It was found that these learning outcomes were confusing. The learning outcomes and the dimensions indicated should be clear and consistent. The marks awarded in the assessment task were not fair and contradict the aims of designing a quality assessment task. A proper marking scheme should be discussed and designed by teachers in order to give a fair and systematic approach in the process of working out the solution for the assessment tasks. Teachers must not depend on BCATs only as a source of feedback for students. Continuous formative assessment should be administered to ensure the students’ mastery of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Haji Mohammad Redzuan Haji Botty & Masitah Shahrill, 2015. "A Critical Review of the School-Based Assessment in Brunei Darussalam," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 3(1), pages 17-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:17-27:id:482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/482/658
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. George Darko & Kaj Björkqvist & Karin Österman, 2019. "Workplace Bullying and Psychological Distress in Public Institutions in Ghana," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 6, January -.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:3:y:2015:i:1:p:17-27:id:482. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.