IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v2y2014i5p111-125id466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Students’ Perspective of Most To Least Preferred Parameters Affecting the Quality of Education in an Affiliated Undergraduate Engineering Institution in Haryana”

Author

Listed:
  • Neeraj Kumari

Abstract

The objective of the study is to find out the students’ perspective of most and least preferred parameters affecting the quality of education in an affiliated undergraduate engineering institution in Haryana, India. It is a descriptive research. The data has been collected with the help of Questionnaire Based Survey.The sample size for the study is 500. The respondents are the students pursuing B.Tech who were selected randomly from the above said geographical area. For data analysis and conclusion of the results of the survey, statistical tool like factor analysis was performed in SPSS.The most preferred aspects of the institution by the students are: enough opportunities for Industry Institute Interaction, entrepreneurship cell conduct sufficient activities, Industry Institute Partnership Cell (IIPC) is active and efficient, sufficient clubs and societies providing developmental activities, adequate activities for enhancement of soft and life skills, good hands - on skills are imparted during the workshop practices, students are encouraged to participate in co-curricular & extra-curricular activities, atmosphere is conducive for the development of the requisite competencies, etc. The least preferred aspects of the institution by the students are: students follow the rules and regulations of the institute, a secured Wi-Fi facility for the students, and fresher party, farewell party, techno fests etc are well organized under disciplined environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Neeraj Kumari, 2014. "“Students’ Perspective of Most To Least Preferred Parameters Affecting the Quality of Education in an Affiliated Undergraduate Engineering Institution in Haryana”," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 2(5), pages 111-125.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:2:y:2014:i:5:p:111-125:id:466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/466/641
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:2:y:2014:i:5:p:111-125:id:466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.