IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v13y2025i3p1143-1166id4372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of hots-based question stimulus types and learning styles on students' cognitive response, thoroughness, and conceptual understanding in biology learning

Author

Listed:
  • Yusuf
  • Nining Purwati
  • Suhirman
  • Saiful Prayogi

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the effects of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) question stimulus types and students' learning styles on cognitive response, thoroughness, and conceptual understanding. The research involved 340 eleventh-grade high school students from three schools in West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. The stimulus types included narration, table, picture, and chart while learning styles were categorized as visual, auditory, and kinesthetic using a 4x3 factorial experimental design. Data on learning styles, cognitive response and thoroughness were collected through questionnaires while conceptual understanding was assessed through tests. Data analysis was performed using MANOVA in SPSS 26.0. Results revealed that stimulus types significantly influenced conceptual understanding (η² = 0.289) with narration stimuli yielding the highest scores but had no significant effect on cognitive response or thoroughness. Learning styles significantly affected thoroughness (η² = 0.031) and conceptual understanding (η² = 0.036) with kinesthetic learners demonstrating the highest thoroughness followed by auditory learners. Additionally, the interaction between stimulus types and learning styles significantly affected cognitive response (η² = 0.048) but not thoroughness or conceptual understanding. These findings suggest that teachers should integrate diverse HOTS question stimuli and consider learning styles to enhance thoroughness and higher-order thinking skills. Future research should replicate this study with larger, diverse samples and explore similar interactions in other subjects to broaden the applicability of the findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusuf & Nining Purwati & Suhirman & Saiful Prayogi, 2025. "The effect of hots-based question stimulus types and learning styles on students' cognitive response, thoroughness, and conceptual understanding in biology learning," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 13(3), pages 1143-1166.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:1143-1166:id:4372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/4372/8699
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:1143-1166:id:4372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.