IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/v13y2025i3p1133-1142id4371.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of leadership style, motivation, competence, and educational process on the quality of education based on structural equation modeling approach with t-test and critical ratio variables

Author

Listed:
  • M.B. Pandjaitan
  • M. Khusaini
  • M.F. Aminuddin
  • Panji Suwarno

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of leadership style, competence, motivation and educational process on the quality of education both partially and simultaneously. This study uses the quantitative method of causality that influences each other with the analysis tool used SEM. The number of populations in this study was 603 respondents, with sampling using a sample size calculator totaling 235 respondents with a confidence level value of 95% and a margin of error of 5%. The sampling method is based on stratified random sampling proportionally. The results of the study showed that there was no significant influence of leadership style on the quality of education. There was no influence of motivation on improving the quality of education. While simultaneously, leadership style, motivation, competence and the education process did not affect the quality of education. Thus, among the 4 independent variables, only the education process variable affected the quality of education. For the lecturer competency variable, there was no influence on improving the quality of education. However, for the education process variable, there was a significant influence on improving the quality of education. The study's insightful findings would enhance educational standards.

Suggested Citation

  • M.B. Pandjaitan & M. Khusaini & M.F. Aminuddin & Panji Suwarno, 2025. "The impact of leadership style, motivation, competence, and educational process on the quality of education based on structural equation modeling approach with t-test and critical ratio variables," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, vol. 13(3), pages 1133-1142.
  • Handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:1133-1142:id:4371
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/4371/8698
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pkp:ijoeap:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:1133-1142:id:4371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dim Michael (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.